Betyg
(12) · 169,00 US$
The build quality is ok, and the price is good, but the image quality is just downright poor. Most people with this lens will try to use it at the 300mm end, ...
19 mars 2010 · Decent optical properties, generous selection of accessories, long guarantee period, a quite good substitute of macro mode and an affordable ...
Fler frågor du kan ställa
Is the Sigma 70-300 a good lens?
What is a 70-300mm lens good for?
Is sigma 70 300mm f4 5.6 dg a macro?
Does sigma 70-300 have image stabilization?
799,00 AUD
Build quality is well above average for the price point. The barrel feels solid and fit and finish are very smooth. Parts of the barrel carry an attractive ...
Betyg
· Recension av Matthew Richards
20 nov. 2011 · Pros · Sharpness is good at 300mm, even when using the largest aperture of f/5.6 · Effective 4-stop optical stabiliser · Robust build quality ...
Thoughts on Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG lens? - Reddit
www.reddit.com › photography › comments › tho...
13 aug. 2015 · The image quality is very much meh, and that is my biggest complaint. Also the small aperture is an issue, especially when you're on the tele ...
3 aug. 2017 · At first glance the image may look good, but when you zoom into 100% you see lots of blur. The distant sign is not readable, and the vertical ...
28 aug. 2010 · This lens is a good example of their work. With its low cost and decent performance this lens is great for budget conscious amateurs to “prosumers”.
22 juli 2012 · Sigma DG OS 70-300mm F4-5.6 ; Pros: nice size and weight. feels solid. fast AF ; Cons: focus and zoom creep. very soft. seems to cause ...
Betyg
· Recension av Gary Wolstenholme
27 jan. 2010 · The lens is quite lightweight and feels at home on full-frame as well as cropped sensor DSLRs. It is mostly constructed of plastic, which is ...