ArticlePDF Available

Is Bombus pomorum (Panzer, 1805) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) a new bumblebee for Siberia or an indigenous species?

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Bombus pomorum (Panzer, 1805) is known from Europe, Anatolia, the Caucasus, and to the Urals in Russia. Two specimens have been collected in the south of Western Siberia for the first time. It is possible that the species is indigenous to Siberia but was not discovered until regular observations were made. There is also a possibility that this observation results from an expansion of the range of B. pomorum. We consider the evidence that our study coincided with a range expansion of the bumblebee species B. pomorum and B. sylvarum (Linnaeus,1761) near the end of 20th century. The distribution and abundance of B. pomorum in Russia and conservation efforts are also discussed.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaon globally by publishing peer-reviewed arcles
online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All arcles published in JoTT are registered under Creave
Commons Aribuon 4.0 Internaonal License unless otherwise menoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducon, and distribuon
of arcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaon.
www.threatenedtaxa.org
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
Building evidence for conservaon globally
Journal of Threatened Taxa
For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit hps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0
For Arcle Submission Guidelines, visit hps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
For Policies against Scienc Misconduct, visit hps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2
For reprints, contact <ravi@threatenedtaxa.org>



Alexandr Byvaltsev, Svyatoslav Knyazev & Anatoly Anogenov
26 January 2021 | Vol. 13 | No. 1 | Pages: 17574–17579
DOI: 10.11609/jo.5889.13.1.17574-17579
Member
Threatened Taxa



The opinions expressed by the authors do not reect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaon Liaison
Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaon, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part-
ners are not responsible for the accuracy of the polical boundaries shown in the maps by the authors.
17574
Editor: Alexander B. Ruchin, the Mordovia State Nature Reserve, Republic of Mordovia, Russia. Date of publicaon: 26 January 2021 (online & print)
Citaon: Byvaltsev, A., S. Knyazev & A. Anogenov (2021). Is Bombus pomorum (Panzer, 1805) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) a new bumblebee for Siberia or an indigenous
species? Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(1): 17574–17579. hps://doi.org/10.11609/jo.5889.13.1.17574-17579
Copyright: © Byvaltsev et al. 2021. Creave Commons Aribuon 4.0 Internaonal License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducon, and distribuon of this
arcle in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaon.
Funding: None.
Compeng interests: The authors declare no compeng interests.
Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Paul H. Williams (Natural History Museum, London) for English language eding and two anonymous reviewers for
valuable comments.
Is Bombus pomorum (Panzer, 1805) (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
a new bumblebee for Siberia or an indigenous species?
Alexandr Byvaltsev 1 , Svyatoslav Knyazev 2 & Anatoly Anogenov 3
1 Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 2, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
2 Russian entomological society. Irtyshskaya Naberezhnaya 14, app. 16, Omsk 644042 Russia.
2 Altai State University, pr. Lenina 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia.
3 Instute of Cytology and Genecs, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Lavrentyeva 10,
Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
1 byvam@yandex.ru (corresponding author), 2 konungomsk@yandex.ru, 3 a9139421391@mail.ru
Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2021 | 13(1): 17574–17579
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
#5889 | Received 23 March 2020 | Final received 16 November 2020 | Finally accepted 29 November 2020
hps://doi.org/10.11609/jo.5889.13.1.17574-17579
PLATINUM
OPEN ACCESS
The bumblebee fauna of Siberia has not been well
studied historically, but great progress has been made
in the last two decades (Konusova & Yanushkin 2000;
Byvaltsev 2008, 2013; Knyazev et al. 2010; Kupianskaya
et al. 2014; Byvaltsev et al. 2013, 2015, 2016). These
and other data are summarized in the Annotated
Catalogue of the Hymenoptera of Russia (Levchenko et
al. 2017). There are 55 species in Siberia, with 52 in each
of the western and eastern parts. There is informaon
about one species newly recorded for Western Siberia –
Bombus pomorum (Panzer, 1805) previously known only
from Europe, Anatolia, the Caucasus and the Ural region.
B. pomorum is one of three species of the
pomorum-group (formerly Rhodobombus) subgenus
Thoracobombus Dalla Torre, 1840 (Williams 1998). The
species can be disnguished from the other members
of the group by its predominately brightly red coloured
metasoma. There are some colour paerns of B.
mesomelas Gerstaecker, 1869, with red hair, although
in most cases the last tergum of B. pomorum has red
hairs, whereas it has black hairs in B. mesomelas. There
are three main colour paerns of B. pomorum females,
which have been regarded as a subspecies by some
authors (Özbek 2002; Rasmont et al. 2015b), but are
considered here to all be B. pomorum s. l.: thorax and
two rst metosomal terga black (nominave taxon in
Western and Central Europe, western Anatolia); thorax
and rst metasomal tergum yellow banded (B. uralensis
Morawitz, 1881 in the territory of European Russia to
Chelyabinsk); thorax and rst metasomal tergum with
the pale bands (B. pomorum var. canus Schmiedeknecht,
1883 in eastern Anatolia and the Caucasus region).
Males everywhere are usually paler than females, and
the variaon is not so disnct.
The previous known distribuon of B. pomorum
is from Denmark, southern Switzerland (58°N) (Løken
1973), and France (Rasmont et al. 1995), to Sverdlovsk
and Chelyabinsk regions in the east (Popov 1923), and
to Greece (Olympus) (Anagnostopoulos 2005), northern
Anatolia (Rasmont & Flagothier 1996), and Transcaucasia
(Skhirtladze 1981; Kirkitadze & Japoshvili 2015) in the
south. Only ve specimens were recorded from Britain
(Kent) between 1834 and 1864 (Jeers 2017). These
could be cases of rare migraon (Alford 1975) or they
NOTE
Bombus pomorum is a new bumblebee for Siberia Byvaltsev et al.
Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2021 | 13(1): 17574–17579 17575
JTT
could have arrived as queens hibernang in ower pots
transported from garden-plant nurseries (Williams et al.
2018). B. pomorum is a meadow species in the steppe
and forest–steppe zones and in the mountains, with a
broad range of feeding plants. Nests are underground,
frequently in small rodent holes (Skorikov 1923;
Efremova 1991).
Two specimens (a queen and a worker) of B.
pomorum were collected in the forest-steppe of the West
Siberian Plain by S. Knyazev and A. Anogenov in 2017
and 2019 respecvely. Label data: queen – Russia, Omsk
region, Gorkovsky District, Serebryanoe vill. [village] vic.
[vicinity], 55°43’0.29”N & 74°20’21.88”E [55.717°N &
74.339°E] , 03.vi.2017, S.A. Knyazev leg. [Knyazev private
collecon, Omsk, Russia]; worker Russia, Novosibirsk
region, Agroles, 54.756°N & 83.146°E, owerbed with
Tagetes sp., 1– 10.ix.2019, A. Anogenov [Novosibirsk
State University, Novosibirsk, Russia – NSU].
The queen of B. pomorum was sent to A. Byvaltsev
by S. Knyazev with other bumblebees for determinaon
in the winter of 2018, but we decided not to publish
this informaon unl supported by rediscovery of more
specimens. A new worker was sent for determinaon
by A. Anogenov, so we now have no doubt about the
presence of this species in Western Siberia.
Figure 1. Distribuon of Bombus pomorum in Russia: yellow dots—literature data | blue—material examined | red—new records. There are
no detailed data for Ulyanovsk region, thus there are no dots on the map in this territory. The map was compiled using the online mapping
soware SimpleMappr (Shorthouse 2010).
Comparave material from Europe, the Caucasus,
and the Ural regions including several types of related
taxa, considered here to be part of B. pomorum s. l., were
examined in Zoological Instute RAS (St. Petersburg,
Russia – ZISP) by A. Byvaltsev: B. uralensis Morawitz,
1881 (replacement name for B. rufescens Eversmann,
1852), Fervidobombus oreas Skorikov, 1926, F. pomorum
avotestaceus Skorikov, 1926. Other members of
pomorum–group have also been studied several
specimens of B. mesomelas from Spain and Italy and
numerous specimens of B. armeniacus Radoszkowski,
1877 from dierent parts of its range. The queen (Image
1a) agrees closely in colour paern with B. uralensis:
metasomal terga 2–6 reddish, thorax and rst segment
of metasoma yellow, head, legs, and the band on the
thorax between wings black. The worker specimen is
paler (Image 1b) but agrees well with some workers
from the European part of Russia in the ZISP collecon,
including having tergum sixth black.
The queen was collected on the high right bank of
the Irtysh river, on the southern slope of a clay cli with
steppe meadow, where the bee was in ight (Image
2). The worker was collected vising Tagetes sp. in the
Agroles selement near Novosibirsk.
B. pomorum is a new record for Siberia, and
Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2021 | 13(1): 17574–17579
Bombus pomorum is a new bumblebee for Siberia Byvaltsev et al.
17576
JTT
for the Omsk and Novosibirsk regions. Thus, the
bumblebee fauna of Siberia includes 56 species, with
53 species recorded for Western Siberia. B. wurenii
Radoszkowski, 1859 and B. lapidarius (Linnaeus, 1758)
were listed as “possible inhabitants” based on literature
records that are probably erroneous (Byvaltsev 2008)
and unconrmed for the present for this territory, so
they are not part of the fauna of Siberia. There are 39
species in the Novosibirsk region and 28 in the Omsk
region. Bombus hypnorum (Linnaeus, 1758), B. lucorum
(Linnaeus, 1761), B. semenoviellus Skorikov, 1910 are
absent for the Omsk region in the catalogue (Levchenko
et al. 2017), but are well known to occur there (Knyazev
et al. 2010).
The new nds expand the range of B. pomorum
eastwards by approximately on 1,400km. Thus, the
distribuon of B. pomorum in Russia (Figure 1) includes
the following regions from specimens examined: Kursk,
Orel, Kaluga, Voronezh, Lipetsk, Tambov, Ryazan, Nizhny
Novgorod, Penza, Orenburg, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan,
Perm, Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, North Ossea, Karachay–
Cherkessia, Stavropol, Omsk, Novosibirsk; with addional
literature records – Kaliningrad (Alen, 1912), Moscow
(Panlov 1957; Levchenko 2012), Chuvashia (Sysolena
1967), Ulyanovsk, Samara (Efremova 1991), Belgorod
(Prisnyi 2005), Saratov (Anikin & Kondraev 2006),
Ivanovo (Tikhomirov 2007), Udmura (Adakhovskiy
2012), Kirov (Yuferev & Levchenko 2014), Crimea
(Rasmont et al. 2015a), Penza (Dobrolubova 2015),
and Bryansk (Goloshchapova & Prokoev 2016). The
map with distribuon in Europe and Western Asia was
published by Rasmont et al. (2015a).
B. pomorum was assessed as being vulnerable in
Europe using the IUCN Red List Criteria (Rasmont et
al. 2015b) because of a populaon decline, esmated
to be more than 30% over the last 10 years so that it is
Image 2. The locality where the queen specimen of Bombus pomorum was collected, descripon in the text (© S. Knyazev).
Image 1. Specimens of Bombus pomorum collected in Western Siberia: a—queen (© S. Knyazev) | b—worker (© A. Byvaltsev).
b
a
Bombus pomorum is a new bumblebee for Siberia Byvaltsev et al.
Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2021 | 13(1): 17574–17579 17577
JTT
considered to be facing a high risk of exncon in the
wild. The bee was in the Red Book of the USSR (Panlov
et al. 1984), but excluded from the main list of threatened
taxa of the Red Book of the Russian Federaon (2001)
and moved to the “Appendix 3” as a species in needs
of monitoring. Federal protecon is weak at present. In
many regions of Russia, B. pomorum is in the regional
Red Books – Kursk (Bausov 2002), Belgorod (Prisnyi
2005), Saratov (Anikin & Kondraev 2006), Ivanovo
(Tikhomirov 2007), Sverdlovsk (Olshvang 2008), Moscow
City (Berezin 2011), Ryazan (Ananieva & Nikolaeva 2011),
Tambov (Ganzha & Ishin 2012), Udmura (Adakhovskiy
2012), Nizhny Novgorod (Zryanin 2014), Kirov (Yuferev &
Levchenko 2014), Bryansk (Goloshchapova & Prokoev
2016), Chelyabinsk (Lagunov & Gorbunov 2017), and
Moscow (Levchenko 2018). In some regions, however,
this species is included only in the appendix as a species
in needs of monitoring – Orenburg (Belov 2019), Lipetsk
(Aleksandrov et al. 2014), Ulyanovsk (Artemieva et
al. 2015) or moved from the main list to the appendix
– Kaluga (Antokhina 2017), or completely excluded –
Rostov (Arzanov 2014), Tatarstan (Nazirov 2016). Reliable
data for a signicant decline in this species are available
only for the Moscow region (Panlov 1957; Berezin et al.
1996; Levchenko 2012, 2018). Based on the collecon
in the ZISP, B. pomorum was abundant in the beginning
of the 20th century in the Orel and Ryazan regions.
There are 995 among the 1,314 pinned specimens of B.
pomorum in the ZISP collected between 1910 and 1924
from the Orel region and 984 of these specimens are
from near the Mohovoe selement (53.05°N & 37.35°E),
257 specimens are from the Ryazan region collected
between 1899 and 1927, and most (248) are from near
the Gremyachka Village (53.48°N & 39.51°E ) collected
by Andrey Petrovich Semyonov–Tyan–Shansky. This
does not mean that the bee was rare in other regions,
but only that there were no regular observaons. It is
likely that B. pomorum, however, is not an abundant
species at present in many parts of its range, but special
studies are required.
There is a queson whether B. pomorum is a recent
invader of the forest–steppe of Western Siberia or
whether it has always lived there. There are several
examples of expansion of bumblebees to the west – B.
hypnorum (Goulson & Williams 2001; Prŷs-Jones 2019),
B. semenoviellus (Smissen & Rasmont 2000; Šima &
Smetana 2012), B. schrencki Morawitz, 1881 (Levchenko
2012). There is no doubt about these cases, because
there is a long history of bumblebee studies in Europe.
The rst comprehensive faunisc review of bumblebees
in the forest-steppe and steppe zones of the West Siberian
Plain was done only at the end of the rst decade of the
current century (Byvaltsev 2008). For example, among
the species listed in that paper B. sylvarum Linnaeus,
1761 was recorded for the rst me for Siberia with the
easternmost observaon in the Kurgan region (55.11°N
& 66.95°E). Later the recorded range was extended to
54.10°N & 75.02°E in the Omsk region based on two
specimens collected in 1996 and 2008 (Byvaltsev 2010;
Knyazev et al. 2010). Aer the species was found in
Altai Territory in 2011 and in the Novosibirsk region in
2014, so the range was extended to 83°E (Levchenko
et al. 2017). Thus, it is possible that B. sylvarum is an
indigenous species for the south of Western Siberia
but was not discovered unl regular observaons were
made. Nevertheless, there is a chance that our study
coincided in me with a range expansion of this species
which was able to begin in the end of 20th century.
The second case is likely, because there are no
specimens of B. sylvarum from Western Siberia in the
collecons of the Instute of Systemacs and Ecology
of Animals SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) and NSU. The
species was never collected previously in the Omsk region
by S. Knyazev, although his observaons in localies
of known records have been annual since 2005, so the
species must be very rare. There were no records of this
bee during regular studies in the Altai Territory between
2005 and 2008 (Byvaltsev 2013) or in Novosibrsk and
its environs between 2001 and 2006 (Byvaltsev 2009).
Although the increasing of percentage of specimens of
B. sylvarum during studies in 2011–2012 in the south of
the Omsk region has been documented (Byvaltsev et al.
2013). The rst record of this bee in Altai Territory was
in near the Klepechikha Village in 2011 (Levchenko et al.
2017), but the species was not collected there in either
2005 or 2008 (Byvaltsev 2013). B. sylvarum is regularly
seen near Novosibirsk since the rst record in 2014.
B. pomorum is not a commercially-reared bee
like B. terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758), and most probably
the observaon is not a result of delivery of goods
by people, as it has been for many pest species. The
spread eastwards of European species into Siberia is
documented for bueries (Knyazev & Kosterin 2003;
Knyazev et al. 2017, 2019). Thus, the discovery of B.
pomorum in Western Siberia looks more likely to be a
result of the natural expansion of this European and
West Asian species. Further research of this queson is
required, including the applicaon of modern molecular
techniques of populaon ecology for studying the
relaonship between populaons in Siberia and those
in Europe.
Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2021 | 13(1): 17574–17579
Bombus pomorum is a new bumblebee for Siberia Byvaltsev et al.
17578
JTT
References
Adakhovskiy, D.A. (2012). Plodovyi shmel – Bombus pomorum (Panzer,
1805), p. 64. In: Baranova, O.G. (ed.). Krasnaya kniga Udmurtskoy
Respubliki. Izdanie 2-e [Red Book of the Udmurt Republic. 2nd edion].
Cheboksary, 458pp. [In Russian]
Aleksandrov, V.N., M.V. Melnikov, V.S. Sarychev, M.N. Tsurikov &
Yu.E. Shubina (eds.) (2014). Red Book of the Lipetsk region. Vol. 2.
Animals. Lipetsk, 484pp. [In Russian]
Alen, J.D. (1912). Die Bienenfauna von Ostpreußen. Schrien der
Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellscha zu Königsberg 53: 114–182.
Alford, D.V. (1975). Bumblebees. Davis-Poynter, London, 352pp.
Anagnostopoulos, I.Th. (2005). The bumblebee fauna of Greece:
an annotated species list including new records for Greece
(Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini). Linzer biologische Beiträge 37:
1013–1026.
Ananieva S.I. & A.M. Nikolaeva (2011). Plodovyi shmel. Bombus
pomorum (Panzer, 1805). p. 274. In: Ivanchev, V.P. & M.V. Kazakova
(eds.). Red Book of the Ryazan region. Ryazan, 626pp. [In Russian]
Anikin, V.V. & G.P. Kondraev (2006). Shmel stepnoy – Bombus
pomorum (Panzer, 1805). p. 338. In: Belov, V.S., G.V. Shlyakhn,
V.V. Anikin, A.V. Belyachenko, M.A. Berezutskiy, V.A. Boldyrev, M.V.
Ermokhin, V.N. Zhigalov, E.V. Zavyalov & V.A. Shashulovskiy (eds.).
Red Book of the Saratov region: Fungi. Lichens. Plants. Animals.
Saratov, 528pp. [In Russian]
Antokhina, V.A. (ed.) (2017). Red Book of the Kaluga region. Vol. 2.
Animals. Kaluga, 406pp. [In Russian]
Artemieva, E.A., A.V. Maslennikova & M.V. Korepova (eds.) (2015).
Red Book of the Ulyanovsk region. Moscow, 550pp [In Russian].
Arzanov, Yu.G. (ed.) (2014). Red Book of the Rostov region. Vol. 2.
Animals. Rostov-on-Don, 280pp. [In Russian]
Bausov, I.A. (2002). Shmel plodovyi – Bombus pomorum (Panzer, 1805),
p. 31. In: Vlasov, A.A. (ed.). Red Book of the Kursk region. Vol. 1. Rare
and threatened species of animals. Tula, 120pp. [In Russian]
Belov, V.S. (ed.). (2019). Red Book of the Orenburg region: Rare and
threatened species of animals, plants and fungi. Orenburg, 488pp.
[In Russian]
Berezin, M.V. (2011). Shmel plodovyi. Bombus pomorum (Panzer,
1805), pp. 445–446. In: Samoylov, B.L. & G.V. Morozova (eds.). Red
Book of the Moscow City. Moscow, 810pp. [In Russian]
Berezin, M.V., V.B. Beiko & N.V. Berezina (1996). Analysis of the
changes of bumblebee populaons in Moscow district throughout
the last 40 years (Bombus, Apidae, Hymenoptera). Zoologichesky
zhurnal 85(2): 212–221. [In Russian]
Byvaltsev, A.M. (2008). Bumblebee (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini)
fauna of the forest-steppe and steppe zones of the West Siberian
Plain. Euroasian Entomological Journal 7(2): 141–147. [In Russian]
Byvaltsev, A.M. (2009). The communies of bumble bees
(Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini) in the city of Novosibirsk and its
environs. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 2: 216–223. hps://
doi.org/10.1134/S1995425509030096
Byvaltsev, A.M. (2010). The range of Bombus sylvarum (Linnaeus,
1761) in Western Siberia. Euroasian Entomological Journal 9(3):
506–507. [In Russian]
Byvaltsev, A.M. (2013). The communies of bumblebees (Hymenoptera,
Apidae, Bombini) of the Kulunda Plain of West Siberia, Russia.
Euroasian Entomological Journal 12(6): 575–586. [In Russian]
Byvaltsev, A.M., K.A. Belova & A.A. Proskuryakova (2013). Populaons
and ecology of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombus)
of the Irtysh steppe in early summer. Vestnik Novosibirskogo
Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Biologiya, Klinicheskaya
meditsina 11(1): 40–46. [In Russian]
Byvaltsev, A.M., K.A. Belova, A.N. Kupianskaya & M.Yu.Proshchalykin
(2015). The diversity and abundance of bumblebees (Hymenoptera:
Apidae, Bombus) in the steppes of Khakassia. A.I. Kurentsov’s Annual
Memorial Meengs 26: 264–276. [In Russian]
Byvaltsev, A.M., M.Yu. Proshchalykin, T.V. Levchenko, A.N. Kupianskaya
& E.N. Akulov (2016). Bumble bee fauna (Hymenoptera, Apidae:
Bombus Latreille) of Krasnoyarsk Territory. A.I. Kurentsov’s Annual
Memorial Meengs 27: 137–154. [In Russian]
Dobrolubova, T.V. (2015). Bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae,
Bombini) of the Penza region and the role of the state nature reserve
“Privolzhskaya lesostep’” in their protecon. University proceedings.
Volga region (Natural Sciences. Biology) 2(10): 42–54. [In Russian]
Efremova, Z.A. (1991). Shmeli Povolzhya. Uchebnoe posobie k
spetskursu [Bumble Bees of the Volga Basin. A Textbook for Students
(Special Course)]. Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical Instute, Ulyanovsk,
92pp. [In Russian]
Ganzha, E.A. & R.N. Ishin (2012). Plodovyi shmel. Bombus pomorum
(Panzer, 1805). p. 166. In Petrova, N.P., G.A. Lada, A.S. Sokolov, E.A.
Ganzha & A.Yu. Okolelov (eds). Red Book of the Tambov region:
Animals. Tambov, 352pp. [In Russian]
Goloshchapova, S.S. & I.L. Prokoev (2016). Shmel plodovyi – Bombus
pomorum (Panzer, 1805). p. 257. In: Bulokhov, A.D., N.N. Panasenko,
Yu.A. Semenishchenkov & E.F. Sitnikov (eds.). Red Book of the
Bryansk region. Bryansk, 432pp. [In Russian]
Goulson, D. & P. Williams (2001). Bombus hypnorum (Hymenoptera:
Apidae), a new Brish bumblebee? Brish Journal of Entomology
and Natural History 14: 129–131.
Jeers, D. (2017). The foraging behavior of a species of bumble bee
(Bombus pomorum) that became exnct in the Brish Isles in the
nineteenth century, Journal of Apicultural Research 56(5): 510–513.
hps://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2017.1355346
Kirkitadze, G.J. & G.O. Japoshvili (2015). Renewed checklist of bees
(Hymenoptera: Apoidea) from Georgia. Annals of Agrarian Science
13(1): 20–32.
Knyazev, S.A., A.M. Byvaltsev, K.B. Ponomarev, V.Yu. Teploukhov
& T.F. Kosheleva (2010). Materialy k izucheniyu fauny shmelei
(Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini) Omskogo Priirtyshia. Omskaya
biologicheskaya shkola 6: 27–29. [In Russian]
Knyazev, S.A., V.V. Ivonin, S.Yu. Sinev, A.L. Lvovsky, V.V. Dubatolov,
S.V. Vasilenko, P.Ya. Ustjuzhanin, K.B. Ponomaryov & A.A. Sal`nik
(2017). New records of Lepidoptera from the South of West Siberian
Plain. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology 7(4): 659–667. hps://doi.
org/10.15421/2017_177
Knyazev, S.A., V.V. Ivonin, P.Ya. Ustjuzhanin, S.V. Vasilenko & V.V.
Rogalyov (2019). New data on Lepidoptera of West Siberian
Plain, Russia. Far Eastern Entomologist 386: 8–20. hps://doi.
org/10.25221/fee.386.2
Knyazev, S.A. & O.E. Kosterin (2003). New records of nemoral bueries
Apatura iris L., 1758 and Maniolia jurna L., 1758 in West Siberia and
their probable zoogeographical signicance. Eurasian Entomological
Journal 2(3): 193–194. [In Russian]
Konusova, O.L. & V.V. Yanushkin (2000). Ecological characteriscs of
bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) of the southern taiga in the Tomsk
part of the Ob River basin. Sibirskiy Ekologicheskiy Zhurnal 7(3):
283–286. [In Russian]
Kupianskaya, A.N., M.Yu. Proshchalykin & A.S. Lelej (2014).
Contribuon to the fauna of bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae:
Bombus Latreille, 1802) of the Republic of Tyva, Eastern Siberia.
Euroasian Entomological Journal 13(3): 290–294.
Lagunov, A.V. & P.Yu. Gorbunov (2017). Shmel plodovyi – Bombus
pomorum (Panzer, 1805). p. 158. In: Bolshakov, V.N. (ed.). Red Book
of the Chelyabinsk region. Animals. Plants. Fungi. Moscow, 504pp.
[In Russian]
Levchenko, T.V. (2012). Contribuons to the fauna of bees
(Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of Moscow Province. 3. Family Apidae.
Genus Bombus Latreille, 1802. Eversmannia 31/32: 72–88. [In
Russian]
Levchenko, T.V. (2018). Shmel plodovyi. Bombus pomorum (Panzer,
1805). p. 302. In: Varlygina, T.I., V.A. Zubakin, N.B. Nikitskii & A.V.
Sviridov (eds.). Red Book of the Moscow region. Moscow region,
810pp. [In Russian]
Levchenko, T.V., A.M. Byvaltsev & M.Yu. Proshchalykin (2017). 78.
Family Apidae, pp. 309-332. In: Belokobylskij S.A. & A.S. Lelej
(eds.). Annotated Catalogue of the Hymenoptera of Russia. Volume
I. Symphyta and Apocrita: Aculeata. Proceedings of the Zoological
Bombus pomorum is a new bumblebee for Siberia Byvaltsev et al.
Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2021 | 13(1): 17574–17579 17579
JTT
Instute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Supplement 6, Saint
Petersbirg, 475pp.
Løken, A. (1973). Studies on Scandinavian bumble bees (Hymenoptera,
Apidae). Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskri 20: 1–218.
Nazirov, A.A. (ed.) (2016). Red Book of the Tatarstan Republic (animals,
plants, fungi). Kazan, 760pp. [In Russian]
Olshvang, V.N. (2008). Plodovyi shmel – Bombus pomorum (Panzer,
1805), p. 103. In: Koryn, N.S. (ed). Red Book of the Sverdlovsk
region. Animals. Plants. Fungi. Ekaterinburg, 256pp. [In Russian]
Özbek, H. (2002). On the bumble bee fauna of Turkey: IV. The subgenera
Megabombus, Eversmannibombus, Laesobombus, Rhodobombus
and Subterraneobombus (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini). Zoology
in the Middle East 25: 79–98. hps://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.2
002.10637909
Panlov, D.V. (1957). Shmeli (Bombidae) Moskovskoi oblas. Uchenye
Zapiski Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo instuta 65
(6): 191–219. [In Russian]
Panlov, D.V., N.I. Kochetova & M.I. Akimushkina (1984). Shmel
stepnoy. Bombus pomorum (Panzer, 1805), pp. 265–266. In:
Borodin, A.M., A.G. Bannikov & V.E. Sokolov (eds). Red Book of
USSR: Rare and threatened species of animals and plants. Vol. 1.
Moscow, 392pp. [In Russian]
Popov, W. (1923). Contribuon à l’étude de la faune des Bourdons des
environs d’Ekathérinburg (Hymenoptera, Bombidae et Psithyridae).
Annales de l’Université de l’Oural 3: 159–169. [In Russian]
Prisnyi, A.B. (2005). Shmel plodovyi – Bombus pomorum (Panzer,
1805), p. 379. In: Prisnyi, A.B. (ed.). Red Book of the Belgorod region.
Rare and threatened species of plants, fungi, lichens and animals.
Belgorod, 532pp. [In Russian]
Prŷs-Jones, O. (2019). Preadaptaon to the vercal: an extra dimension
to the natural history and nesng habits of the Tree Bumble Bee,
Bombus (Pyrobombus) hypnorum. Journal of Apicultural Research
58(5): 643–659. hps://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2019.1634462
Rasmont, P., A. Ebmer, J. Banaszak & G. Zanden (1995). Hymenoptera
Apoidea Gallica. Liste taxonomique des abeilles de France, de
Belgique, de Suisse et du Grand Duché du Luxembourg. Bullen de
la Société Entomologique de France 100: 1–98.
Rasmont, P. & D. Flagothier (1996). Biogéographie et choix oraux des
bourdons (Hymenoptera,Apidae) de la Turquie; rapport préliminaire
1995–1996. N.A.T.O.-O.T.A.N. TU-Pollinaon project directed by
Prof. Dr O. Kaanoglu, Çukurova Üniversitesi Adana, Université de
Mons-Hainaut, Mons, 72pp.
Rasmont P., M. Franzén, T. Lecocq, A. Harpke, S.P.M. Roberts, J.C.
Biesmeijer, L. Castro, B. Cederberg, L. Dvorák L, U. Fitzpatrick,
Y. Gonseth, E. Haubruge, G. Mahé, A. Manino, D. Michez, J.
Neumayer, F. Ødegaard, J. Paukkunen, T. Pawlikowski, S.G. Pos,
M. Reemer, J. Seele, J. Straka & O. Schweiger (2015a). Climac
Risk and Distribuon Atlas of European Bumblebees. Biorisk 10
(Special Issue): 246pp. hps://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.10.4749
Rasmont, P., S. Roberts, B. Cederberg, V. Radchenko & D. Michez
(2015b). Bombus pomorum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
2015: e.T13356500A57368299. Downloaded on 06 February 2020.
Red Book of the Russian Federaon (2001). hp://www.sevin.ru/
redbook/index.html Accessed 09 March 2020. [In Russian]
Shorthouse, D.P. (2010). SimpleMappr, an online tool to produce
publicaon-quality point maps. Retrieved from hps://www.
simplemappr.net Accessed March 12, 2020.
Šima, P. & V. Smetana (2012). Bombus (Cullumanobombus)
semenoviellus (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombini) new species for the
bumble bee fauna of Slovakia. Klapalekiana 48: 141–147.
Skhirtladze, I.A. (1981). Pchelinye Zakavkazya (Hymenoptera,
Apoidea). Metsniereba, Tbilisi, 148pp. [In Russian]
Skorikov, A.S. (1923). Les bourdons de la faune paléarque. Pare
I. Biologie généraly (la zoogeographie y compris), pp. 1–160. In:
Bogdanov-Katjkov N.N. (ed.). Bullen de la Staon Régionale
Protectrice des Plantes à Petrograd 4(1), Peterburg, 160pp. [In
Russian]
Smissen J. & P. Rasmont (2000). Bombus semenoviellus Skorikov 1910,
eine für Westeuropa neue Hummelart (Hymenoptera: Bombus,
Cullumanobombus). Bembix 13: 21–24.
Sysolena, L.G. (1967). The fauna of bumble bees in Chuvashia.
Uchenye Zapiski Chuvashskogo Pedagogicheskogo Instuta. Serya
Biologicheskih nauk 23: 111–121. [in Russian]
Tikhomirov, A.M. (2007). Shmel plodovyi – Bombus pomorum (Panzer,
1805), p. 70. In: Isaev, V.A. (ed.). Red Book of the Ivanovo region. Vol.
1: Animals]. Ivanovo, 236pp. [In Russian]
Williams, P.H. (1998). An annotated checklist of bumble bees with an
analysis of paerns of descripon (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini).
Bullen of The Natural History Museum (Entomology) 67: 79–152.
updated at www.nhm.ac.uk/bombus/ Accessed 09 March 2020.
Williams, P.H., J.M. Lobo & A.S. Meseguer (2018). Bumblebees take
the high road: climacally integrave biogeography shows that
escape from Tibet, not Tibetan upli, is associated with divergences
of present-day Mendacibombus. Ecography 41: 461-477. hps://
doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03074
Yuferev, G.I. & T.V. Levchenko (2014). Shmel plodovyi – Bombus
pomorum (Panzer, 1805), p. 126. In: Baranova, O.G., E.P. Lachokhi,
V.M. Ryabova, V.N. Sotnikova, E.M. Tarasova, L.G. Tslishcheva (eds.).
Red Book of the Kirov region: animals, plants, fungi. Kirov, 336pp.
[In Russian]
Zryanin, V.A. (2014). Shmel plodovyi – Bombus pomorum (Panzer,
1805), pp. 271–272. In: Anufriev, G.A., S.V. Bakka & N.Yu. Kiseleva
(eds.). Red Book of the Nizhny Novgorod region. Nizhny Novgorod,
448pp. [In Russian]
Threatened Taxa




www.threatenedtaxa.org
The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaon globally by
publishing peer-reviewed arcles online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org.
All arcles published in JoTT are registered under Creave Commons Aribuon 4.0 Internaonal License
unless otherwise menoned. JoTT allows allows unrestricted use, reproducon, and distribuon of arcles
in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaon.
Member
Threatened Taxa





Bhutan
– Bal Krishna Koirala, Karma Jamtsho, Phuntsho Wangdi, Dawa Tshering,
Rinchen Wangdi, Lam Norbu, Sonam Phuntsho, Sonam Lhendup & Tshering Nidup,
Pp. 17455–17469

– Naren Sreenivasan, Neethi Mahesh & Rajeev Raghavan, Pp. 17470–17476


– Sutanu Satpathy, Kuppusamy Sivakumar & Jeyaraj Antony Johnson, Pp. 17477–17486

– Dip Thakuria & Jan Kalita, Pp. 17487–17503


India
– Tashi Dorjee Bapu & Gibji Nimasow, Pp. 17504–17512




– Kamarul Hambali, Nor Fakhira Muhamad Fazli, Aainaa Amir, Norashikin Fauzi,
Nor Hizami Hassin, Muhamad Azahar Abas, Muhammad Firdaus Abdul Karim &
Ai Yin Sow, Pp. 17513–17516


– Naziya Khurshid, Hidayatulla Tak, Ruqeya Nazir, Kulsum Ahmad Bhat &
Muniza Manzoor, Pp. 17517–17520



– Jorge Rojas-Jiménez, Juan A. Morales-Acuña, Milena Argüello-Sáenz,
Silvia E. Acevedo-González, Michael J. Yabsley & Andrea Urbina-Villalobos, Pp. 17521–
17528


– H.H.S. Myo, K.V. Jayachandran & K.L. Khin, Pp. 17529–17536


– Milton Norman Medina, Alexander Anichtchenko & Jürgen Wiesner, Pp. 17537–
17542



– Kalesh Sadasivan, Manoj Sethumadavan, S. Jeevith & Baiju Kochunarayanan,
Pp. 17543–17547



– Kalesh Sadasivan & Muhamed Jafer Palot, Pp. 17548–17553


– C. Bagathsingh & A. Benniamin, Pp. 17554–17560
Notes


– Suraj Kumar Dash, Abhisek Cheri, Dipanjan Naha & Sambandam Sathyakumar,
Pp. 17561–17563



– Priyan Perera, Hirusha Randimal Algewaa & Buddhika Vidanage, Pp. 17564–17568


– Marcos Antônio Melo & David de Almeida Braga, Pp. 17569–17573
Is 

– Alexandr Byvaltsev, Svyatoslav Knyazev & Anatoly Anogenov, Pp. 17574–17579



– Aparna Sureshchandra Kalawate, Banani Mukhopadhyay, Sonal Vithal Pawar &
Vighnesh Durgaram Shinde, Pp. 17580–17586

India
– Vedagiri Thirumurugan, Nehru Prabakaran, Vishnu Sreedharan Nair &
Chinnasamy Ramesh, Pp. 17587–17591

– Pema Zangpo, Phub Gyeltshen & Pankaj Kumar, Pp. 17592–17596


– M. Uma Maheshwari & K. Karthigeyan, Pp. 17597–17600


– H.U. Abhijit, Y.L. Krishnamurthy & K. Gopalakrishna Bhat, Pp. 17601–17603


– Mitesh B. Patel, Pp. 17604–17606

– N. Rajaprabu, P. Ponmurugan & Gaurav K. Mishra, Pp. 17607–17610
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Many claims that uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau (QTP) drove the divergences of extant high-elevation biota have recently been challenged. For Mendacibombus bumblebees, high-elevation specialists with distributions centred on the QTP, we examine broader explanations. We extend integrative biogeography to cover multiple contributing factors by using a framework of sequential filters: (1) molecular evidence from four genes is used to estimate phylogenetic relationships, with time calibration from a published estimate; (2) spatial evidence from current distributions is combined with the phylogeny and constrained by a model of short-distance dispersal along mountain corridors to estimate ancestral distributions by both S-DIVA and S-DEC analysis; (3) geological evidence from the literature is used to constrain when high mountain ranges were uplifted to become potential corridors; and (4) climatological evidence from Mendacibombus niche-evolution reconstructions and from palaeoclimate simulations is used to constrain when habitat was suitable in key gaps within corridors. Explanations for Mendacibombus distributions can be identified that require only short-distance dispersal along mountain corridors, commensurate with the limited dispersal ability observed for bumblebees. These explanations depend on the timing of uplift of mountain ranges, regional climate change, and climate-niche evolution. The uplift of the QTP may have contributed to the initial Oligocene divergence of the common ancestor of Mendacibombus from other bumblebees, but for the first two thirds of the history of Mendacibombus, only a single lineage has present-day descendants. Divergence of multiple extant Mendacibombus lineages coincided with the Late Miocene-Pliocene uplift of externally connecting mountains, combined with regional climate cooling. These changes provided greater connectivity of suitable habitat, allowing these bumblebees to disperse out of the western QTP via new high bridges, escaping along the mountain corridors of the Tian Shan and Hindu Kush ranges, reaching eventually far to the west (Iberian Peninsula) and to the north-east (Kamchatka).
Article
Full-text available
Thirty-eight species of bumblebees are known in Khakassia Republic. Five species, namely Bombus cullumanus serrisquama Morawitz, 1888, B. cryptarum (Fabricius, 1775), B. mocsaryi Kriechbaumer, 1877, B. semenoviellus Skorikov, 1910, and B. soroeensis (Fabricius, 1777), are recorded from Khakassia for the first time. One species, B. sylvarum (Linnaeus, 1761), is excluded from the list of bumblebees of republic. The bumblebees are more abundant and diverse in the mountain steppes then on lowland steppe regions of Khakassia. The abundance and diversity of bumblebees in the lowland steppes in Khakass Republic and in the zonal steppes of the West-Siberian plain are similar.
Article
Full-text available
The abundance and diversity of bumblebees in the Kulunda Plain of West Siberia have been investigated. The structure of groups of dominant species is discussed in detail. The bumblebees are more abundant and diverse in the regions with good representation of birch forest stands. The communities of these insects here are relatively homogeneous in species composition and number. The groups of foragers in the flood plains of small rivers are similar amongst them. The bumblebees in sites near the pinewoods are less diverse, but not in abundance, and local communities differ. In the dry steppes, the abundance and diversity of bumblebees are, with few exceptions, very low.
Article
Full-text available
Bees are one of the most diverse insect group in the world.Bees have a special importance for ecosystems. Almost 75% of agricultural production depends on pollination intensivity.Many of bees are used in green houses for increasing yield. Bees are not well protected against influence of different factors, which can affect on their number decline. For conservation of bees the knowledge of their importance, their distributional data completeness are very important. During last 30 years taxonomic status of bees distributed in Georgia had not been revised. Complete list of Georgian bees was incorporated in the list of Caucasus bees in 1981. Since that time we made a first complete list of all bees distributed in Georgia, with taxonomic changes had been done during last 33 years. Totally it made 356 species belonging to 46 different genera and 6 families. We made more then 150 changes in the names of families, genera and species recorded and published from Georegia. The most abundant family was family Apidae with 107 species. Must be noted that 41 species of Bombus have been registered in Georgia, which are composing Bombus fauna of Caucasus with additional 3 species. We were not able to find validity of Bombus georgicus Vogt. Therefore we did not include this species in the list.
Article
Full-text available
32 species of Bombus and 7 species of Psithyrus are recorded in the forest-steppe and steppe zones of the West Siberian Plain. The distribution of some bumblebee species in West Siberia with confusing or mistaken reference data, has been reexamined. The westernmost localities for B. pseudobaicalensis Vogt, 1911, and easternmost for B. sylvarum (Linnaeus, 1761) are presented. It is shown that bumblebee diversity in West Siberia distinctly decreases southward.
Article
Full-text available
New data allow to describe the distribution pattern of B. sylvaum in the eastern part of its range more exactly. Data for abundance and ecotopes are given.
Article
Full-text available
Bumble bees are among the minority of groups of organisms for which there is some evidence that most species have already been described. Nonetheless, a synoptic revision of the group has been delayed, in part by the difficulties imposed by an unusually high ratio of names to species (averaging more than 11). To explore some of the factors contributing to this phenomenon, historical and geographical trends in the naming of bumble bees are summarised. This shows that most taxa were named by European authors, beginning with the most widespread European species, moving later to not only the more narrowly distributed species and to species from other parts of the world, but also to taxa at progressively lower nomenclatural ranks, particularly within the more widespread European species. Nearly half of all of these names have been published since the last world-wide checklist in 1922. In attempting to bring this up to date, the present checklist adopts broad interpretations of species and recognises a total of 239 recent species (including the social parasites but excluding fossil taxa), with 24 new synonyms and 29 provisional synonyms. The list also includes notes on alternative interpretations of taxonomic status and on nomenclatural problems, drawing attention to those cases where further research is most urgently needed. In particular, suggestions are presented for an application to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to use its Plenary Power in order to conserve current usage of the commonly used names atratus, balteatus, distinguendus, flavifrons, humilis, hyperboreus, mesomelas, mixtus, norvegicus, polaris, pyrenaeus, soroeensis and variabilis.
Article
The Tree Bumble Bee, Bombus hypnorum, is a native of forest environments but has now successfully colonised urban areas. To better understand its success in an anthropogenic context, this review considers aspects of its natural history and nesting habits using a combination of published literature, anecdotal field observations by entomolo-gists from a number of countries, and information from the BWARS database. Where man's influence is minimal, B. hypnorum appears to nest almost exclusively in tree cavities. Modern woodlands tend to be managed and nest-cavity poor. Urban areas with gardens provide foraging opportunities together with a large supply of well-insulated and well-protected aboveground nest sites. B. hypnorum currently appears to do better in urban areas than managed woodlands, and quite possibly better than it ever did in primeval forest. In Britain, where it was first found in 2001, its notable success appears to reflect the absolute quantity of suitable anthropogenic, and specifically urban, nesting habitat. Conspicuous nest placement has resulted in more nest records for this recent arrival than exist for any native British bumble bee species. In "helping itself" to an anthropogenic nesting niche, B. hypnorum highlights how important appropriate nesting sites are in determining which bumble bee species can live in any given area. Detailed information on nest site preferences and availability needs to inform conservation measures for threatened native species.
Article
Three species of bumble bee (Bombus spp.) are known to have become extinct in the British Isles. The first of these, Bombus pomorum was last collected (presumed extinct) in 1864. Here, I report the first direct evidence of the foraging behavior of Bombus pomorum from the analysis of pollen preserved on the hairs of the three surviving British museum specimens. The pollen removed from the bees belongs to 11 different plant families including Amaranthaceae, Apiaceae, Araliaceae, Asteraceae, Campanulaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Fabaceae, Geraniaceae, Lamiaceae, Onagraceae and Pinaceae. The diversity of the pollen taxa indicates that when present in the British Isles, Bombus pomorum adopted a generalized rather than narrow foraging strategy.