Betyg
· 6 996,95 US$ · Recension av Jim Fisher
12 juni 2015 · It's sharp enough to shoot at f/4 throughout its zoom range, which is the main reason to pay a premium and carry a heavy zoom.
25 juli 2013 · The AF-S Nikkor 200-400mm f/4G ED VR II performs well, achieving an overall DxOMark Score of 25. Sharpness isn't up to the fixed focal length equivalents.
1 800,00 US$
This VR II version adds a little bit of Nikon's newest Nano-Crystal Coating, which is a more efficient replacement for multicoating. Flare and ghosts were never ...
8 juni 2021 · It's a weaker lens at distance, but still usable, especially compared to some consumer-level zooms you might try (eg 70-300mm).
11 mars 2022 · It's a very nice lens and works well for large mammals. It's also pretty good for sports. It works better for near subjects than distant subjects for some ...
Fler frågor du kan ställa
What is the difference between AF I and AF-S in Nikon?
What is the difference between Nikon ED and VR lenses?
What is the difference between Nikon 18 200mm VR and VR II?
22 apr. 2020 · It is a great sidelines lens with prime quality output as long as it is shot in its sweet spot. The sweet spot is within 100 meters of the ...
The 200-400mm is an easy lens to use, and just gets better the more you use it. The tripod collar doesn't come off, but you can use tools to remove the foot.
6 749,00 US$
The lens is fast and i really like the results taken at the low f-stops. I have used the Nikon 200-400 on my Nikon D700 and My Nikon D300s and get good results…
The Nikon 200-400mm is a perfectly versatile lens that can do just about anything you need! Or rent it for a while from Borrowlenses.com
Betyg
(5)
This may be the best lens I have ever tested, used, or owned. It's sharpness throughout almost its entire focal length is unsurpassed, even by prime lenses. The ...
