US20080007718A9 - Polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter - Google Patents
Polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080007718A9 US20080007718A9 US10/520,819 US52081905A US2008007718A9 US 20080007718 A9 US20080007718 A9 US 20080007718A9 US 52081905 A US52081905 A US 52081905A US 2008007718 A9 US2008007718 A9 US 2008007718A9
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- coupler
- output
- polarization
- optical signal
- generating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 68
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 62
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000002168 optical frequency-domain reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 14
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000005284 basis set Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005562 fading Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035559 beat frequency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M11/00—Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
- G01M11/30—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides
- G01M11/33—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter being disposed at one fibre or waveguide end-face, and a light receiver at the other end-face
- G01M11/331—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter being disposed at one fibre or waveguide end-face, and a light receiver at the other end-face by using interferometer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M11/00—Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
- G01M11/30—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides
- G01M11/31—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter and a light receiver being disposed at the same side of a fibre or waveguide end-face, e.g. reflectometers
- G01M11/3172—Reflectometers detecting the back-scattered light in the frequency-domain, e.g. OFDR, FMCW, heterodyne detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M11/00—Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
- G01M11/30—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides
- G01M11/31—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter and a light receiver being disposed at the same side of a fibre or waveguide end-face, e.g. reflectometers
- G01M11/3181—Reflectometers dealing with polarisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M11/00—Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
- G01M11/30—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides
- G01M11/33—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter being disposed at one fibre or waveguide end-face, and a light receiver at the other end-face
- G01M11/337—Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter being disposed at one fibre or waveguide end-face, and a light receiver at the other end-face by measuring polarization dependent loss [PDL]
Definitions
- the present invention relates to optical measurements, and more particularly, to a device and method for performing polarization diversity detection.
- a probe signal and a reference signal originating from the same source are typically mixed, resulting in fringes that can be detected and used to asses information about the device being probed.
- a reference signal is mixed with a signal whose phase and/or amplitude is modified by a parameter to be measured.
- the mixing produces an interference signal, and the amplitude of the interference signal depends on how efficiently the two optical signals mix.
- the mixing efficiency is 100%.
- the two signals have orthogonal polarization states, no mixing occurs—0% efficiency.
- the reduced, mixed-signal amplitude results from an unmixed component in an orthogonal polarization state. This inefficiency is usually referred to as polarization induced fringe fading.
- Polarization diversity detection overcomes polarization induced fading.
- One commonly known interferometric scheme that can suffer from polarization fading is Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry (OFDR).
- OFDR injects a highly monochromatic beam of light into the optical system or device to be tested. The frequency of that light is varied slowly with a time-linear sweep, and the optical signal back-scattered from the optical system is detected by coherently mixing the back-scattered signal with the reference input signal.
- the beat frequency component of the mixed signal (corresponding to an interference signal), is measured to determine a position of the back-scattering (reflection) point in the optical system/fiber.
- the interference signal amplitude also determines a back-scattering factor and an attenuation factor for the reflected light.
- FIG. 1 shows schematically a Mach-Zender interferometer.
- the arrows denote electric field (E) vector components.
- the power measured at the detector is proportional to the square of the absolute value of (E 1 +E 2 ).
- the interference terms of this relationship are proportional to E 1 ⁇ E 2 *+E 2 ⁇ E 1 *, where * denotes a complex conjugate.
- the basis of a vector set includes two vectors in two dimensions or three vectors in three dimensions that are used to represent all other possible vectors. Knowing the basis of a vector set is essentially the same as knowing the coordinate system for a point in space.
- a location may be described as being at 32 degrees North and 25 degrees West.
- the coordinate system is the set of latitude and longitude lines on the Earth, and the particular location is understood.
- the basis set is a pair of vectors, each one degree (60 nautical miles) long, with one vector pointed to the North and one vector pointed to the West.
- Polarization diversity detection detects the s and p components (or projections onto the s and p axes) of E 1 +E 2 separately using two S and P detectors.
- the power at each detector is proportional to the modulus squared of the components of the total field: P S ⁇
- Polarization diversity detection may be implemented using a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) as show in FIG. 3 .
- PBS polarizing beam splitter
- the measured powers at the S and P detectors are P S ⁇
- the crystalline structure of the PBS imposes an orthonormal basis onto which the incident field is projected. That orthonormal basis is needed to extract information contained in the E 1 and E 2 amplitudes.
- polarizing beam splitters add stray reflections to the detected signals.
- the present invention performs polarization diversity detection without using a polarizing beam splitter.
- Field vectors from one interferometer arm are used as the basis upon which to project a field vector from the other interferometer arm.
- Polarization diversity detection is performed using only standard optical couplers, e.g., 50-50 couplers. A polarization beam splitter is not needed.
- a first coupler receives a first optical signal from a device or system under test and generates first and second coupler outputs.
- a second coupler receives a second optical signal from a reference source and generates third and fourth coupler outputs.
- a first polarization controller (PC) changes the polarization state of the third coupler output and generates a PC output.
- a third coupler generates a first combined output from the first coupler output and the PC output.
- a fourth coupler generates a second combined output from the second coupler output and the fourth coupler output.
- a first detector detects a first power of the first combined output in a first projection plane, and a second detector detects a second power of the second combined output in a second projection plane.
- a processor processes interference terms in the first and second powers in the first and second projection planes to determine one or more characteristics of the first optical signal.
- a second polarization controller changes the polarization of the first optical signal before it is received in the first optical coupler.
- the first and second polarization controllers are adjusted to calibrate the fiber optic measurement device. Different second polarization controller settings result in multiple corresponding vector measurements at the first and second detectors.
- the processor calculates a vector calibration matrix using these vector measurements.
- the processor corrects subsequent detected vector measurements using the vector calibration matrix. The corrected vector measurements ensure that the vector representation of the first optical signal are in an ortho-normal basis set.
- the OFDR components can be constructed simply using optical fiber, and if desired, from the same type of standard low-loss fiber. Matching the type of fiber throughout the optical network results in very low losses with essentially zero scattering events in the network. As a result, the OFDR produces very clean time domain measurements (only reflection events from the device under test appear).
- Couplers are constructed by melting two optical fibers together.
- coupler manufacturers need only purchase fiber (an inexpensive commodity) designed for that wavelength and melt two sections together using the same process for all wavelengths. No re-tooling or significant changes to the process are required.
- couplers are readily available at all wavelengths at a reasonable price in contrast to polarization beam splitters and other bulk-optic based optical components.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a Mach-Zender interferometer
- FIG. 2 illustrates orthogonal measurement field vectors E 1 and E 2 and two basis vectors S and P;
- FIG. 3 illustrates a Mach-Zender interferometer with a polarization beam splitter
- FIG. 4 illustrates in function block format an optical frequency domain reflectometer (OFDR) for polarization diversity detection without a polarization beam splitter;
- OFDR optical frequency domain reflectometer
- FIG. 5 illustrates a different configuration of the OFDR shown in FIG. 4 ;
- FIG. 6 illustrates in further detail the detectors shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 ;
- FIG. 7 illustrates in further detail the data acquisition block in FIGS. 4 and 5 ;
- FIG. 8 is a vector diagram showing the measurement field vector E 1 and reference field vector E 2 each being projected and summed on each of the basis axes S and P in accordance with projections implemented by a polarization beam splitter;
- FIG. 9 is a similar vector diagram for the all coupler OFDR implementations found in FIGS. 4 and 5 ;
- FIG. 10 is a vector projector diagram showing E 1 projected onto virtual reference fields E′ S and E′ P .
- An OFDR 10 includes a tunable laser 12 for generating an electric field at a particular frequency (controlled by the frequency sweep signal from processor 32 ) provided to a standard optical coupler 14 .
- Any such coupler may be employed, and one non-limiting example is Gould part number 23-40355-33-01201 manufactured by Gould Fiber Optics Division of Gould Electronics of Baltimore, Md.
- Coupler 14 splits the input field E IN into two electric field signals E 1 and E 2 .
- E 1 is provided through optical coupler 36 and connector 38 to a device or system under test (DUT) 40 .
- a back-scattered signal E 1 to be measured as a function of its reflection point along the fiber is provided through coupler 36 to a first coupler 16 .
- the reference signal E 2 is provided to a second coupler 22 .
- a polarization state of a first output of coupler 22 is changed in polarization controller 24 .
- the output of polarization controller 24 is the reference signal E 2 in a first reference plane denoted “S” so that this reference signal is referred to as E S .
- the second output of coupler 22 corresponds to the reference signal in another reference plane labeled “P” so that this signal is denoted E P .
- the first output of coupler 16 is E X and equals M 13 E 1 as described below.
- the second output of coupler 16 is E Y and equals M 14 E 1 .
- the couplers 18 and 26 output the signals E X +E S and E Y +E P , respectively, which are detected by respective detectors 20 and 28 .
- the output of S-detector 20 is a power P S
- the output of P-detector 28 is a power P P .
- Both powers are provided to a data acquisition unit 30 which provides digital information to processor 32 .
- the processor 32 processes the information and generates the desired electric field output signal E OUT which is then provided to a display 34 to display one or more parameters of E OUT .
- Such parameters may include amplitude and phase of the scattered light and the particular location at which the reflection occurs.
- Processor 32 sweeps the tunable laser 12 through a particular sweep range specified by a starting wavelength and a finishing wavelength, e.g., 1540 nm-1580 nm.
- FIG. 5 illustrates another example embodiment with a slightly different configuration in which the device under test 40 is coupled directly to the output of the coupler 14 . Both embodiments employ a polarization controller 42 used in calibrating the OFDR 10 as will be later described.
- the detectors 20 and 28 are illustrated in further detail in FIG. 6 .
- Any suitable detector may be employed, and one non-limiting example is a ThorLabs PDA 400 optical detector manufactured by ThorLabs of Newton, N.J.
- Each detector includes a photodetector 42 and an amplifier 44 coupled to a low-pass filter 46 .
- the data acquisition block 30 includes an analog-to-digital conversion block 48 coupled to a buffer 50 .
- the filtered output from the detector is converted into a digital format by the digital-to-analog conversion means 48 , and the digital signal is stored in the buffer 50 before being processed by the data processor 32 .
- the vector diagram in FIG. 8 shows projected fields on the S and P power detector reference planes.
- the reference fields S and P are assumed orthogonal—a reasonable assumption if a PBS is used.
- the S component or projection of the measured field E 1 is denoted E X on the horizontal axis
- the P component or projection of the measured field E 1 is denoted E Y along the vertical axis.
- the reference field E 2 is also projected onto the S and P axes.
- the sum of E X and E S is detected on the S detector 20
- the sum of the projections E P and E Y is detected on the P detector 28 .
- FIG. 9 shows the projection of E X onto E S and the projection of E Y onto E P .
- E 1 can be recovered from these projections shown in FIG. 10 using a linear mathematical transformation.
- the propagation of a field in an optical fiber from one location to another through any linear section of the system can be represented by a complex 2 ⁇ 2 matrix. This matrix will account for all effects of the linear section including loss, polarization rotation, and polarization-dependent loss.
- E x M 13 E 1
- E y M 14 E 1 .
- the vectors S and P no longer form an orthonormnal basis. But knowledge of the amplitude and relative angle between the vectors S and P allows the reconstruction of E 1 in an orthogonal basis.
- the vectors s ′ and p ′ act as the basis vectors onto which E 1 is projected. Knowledge of the amplitudes of and relative angle between s ′ and p ′ allows the projection of E 1 onto an orthogonal basis set. What is required is a process by which this correcting matrix can be quickly and efficiently found to transform the measurements into an ortho-normal basis set.
- the calibration begins by adjusting the polarization controllers PC 1 and PC 2 ( 41 and 24 ). With the reference laser 12 in the continuous sweep mode, PC 1 is adjusted so that the fringes observed on the P-detector 28 are maximized. When this is accomplished, the fringes on the S-detector 20 are minimized by adjusting PC 1 . When this is accomplished, PC 1 is adjusted so the fringe levels on the S- and P-detectors are approximately equal (to within ⁇ 10%).
- the following represent these measurements: v ⁇ 1 ( E s 1 E p 1 )
- v ⁇ 2 ( E s 2 E p 2 )
- v ⁇ 3 ( E s 3 E p 3 )
- v ⁇ 4 ( E s 4 E p 4 ) . ( 9 )
- optical fiber can support a variety of different modes. To handle that mode variety, one coupler and one detector would be added for each new mode present in the fiber. “Mode Controllers” corresponding to fiber loops (like the polarization controller loops) would also be used in each reference path. Calibration would be carried out using analogous linear algebra operations. The absence of stray reflections as described above means that the invention is particularly effective at measuring the very low scatter levels that come from the non-homogeneities in the optical fiber core. Optical-fiber, scatter-level measurements can be used to measure losses within an optical network independently of the manner of connection to the network.
Abstract
Description
- Priority is claimed from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/394,260, filed on Jul. 9, 2002. The contents of this provisional application are incorporated by reference.
- This application is related to commonly-assigned PCT Application No. ______, entitled “Heterodyne Optical Spectrum Analyzer,” filed on Jul. 8, 2003, and to commonly-assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/005,819, entitled “Apparatus and Method for the Complete Characterization of Optical Devices Including Loss, Birefringence, and Dispersion Effects,” filed on Dec. 14, 2001.
- The present invention relates to optical measurements, and more particularly, to a device and method for performing polarization diversity detection.
- Mixing between a reference signal and a data signal is often necessary to extract information about an optical device. A probe signal and a reference signal originating from the same source are typically mixed, resulting in fringes that can be detected and used to asses information about the device being probed. In interferometric sensing, a reference signal is mixed with a signal whose phase and/or amplitude is modified by a parameter to be measured.
- The mixing produces an interference signal, and the amplitude of the interference signal depends on how efficiently the two optical signals mix. When the two signals have the same polarization state, the mixing efficiency is 100%. When the two signals have orthogonal polarization states, no mixing occurs—0% efficiency. Between these two limits, only the portion of the signals whose polarization states resolve onto a single polarization axis actually mix. The reduced, mixed-signal amplitude results from an unmixed component in an orthogonal polarization state. This inefficiency is usually referred to as polarization induced fringe fading.
- Polarization diversity detection overcomes polarization induced fading. One commonly known interferometric scheme that can suffer from polarization fading is Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry (OFDR). OFDR injects a highly monochromatic beam of light into the optical system or device to be tested. The frequency of that light is varied slowly with a time-linear sweep, and the optical signal back-scattered from the optical system is detected by coherently mixing the back-scattered signal with the reference input signal. The beat frequency component of the mixed signal, (corresponding to an interference signal), is measured to determine a position of the back-scattering (reflection) point in the optical system/fiber. The interference signal amplitude also determines a back-scattering factor and an attenuation factor for the reflected light.
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,376,830 and 5,789,521 provide further details regarding OFDR measurement and are incorporated herein by reference. Reference may also be made to commonly-assigned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/005,819, entitled “Apparatus and Method for the Complete Characterization of Optical Devices Including Loss, Birefringence, and Dispersion Effects,” filed on Dec. 14, 2001.
- A single mode optical fiber supports two degenerate polarization modes. This degeneracy causes field energy to be transferred between the modes as they propagate down the fiber. This phenomenon causes the polarization fading in fiber-optic interferometers.
FIG. 1 shows schematically a Mach-Zender interferometer. The arrows denote electric field (E) vector components. Polarization fading occurs whenever E1 and E2 are not co-linear, i.e.,E 1·E 2=|E 1∥E 2|cos θ, θ≠0. The power measured at the detector is proportional to the square of the absolute value of (E1+E2). The interference terms of this relationship are proportional to E1·E2*+E2·E1*, where * denotes a complex conjugate. When a first coupler C1 splits the input field Ein, there is a chance that the split fields E1 and E2 in the respective interferometer arms evolve into orthogonal polarizations. As described above, in that situation, no interference fringes will be detected, and there is complete polarization fading or 0% mixing efficiency. - A worst case scenario in which the fields interfering on the detector, E1 and E2, are orthogonal is shown in
FIG. 2 . More formally, in some orthogonal basis, the fields can be written E1=(a, 0)exp(iωτ) and E2=(0, d), where τ is the propagation time difference between the two interferometer arms (τ=neL/c, where ne is the effective (modal) index of the fiber. The basis of a vector set includes two vectors in two dimensions or three vectors in three dimensions that are used to represent all other possible vectors. Knowing the basis of a vector set is essentially the same as knowing the coordinate system for a point in space. For example, a location may be described as being at 32 degrees North and 25 degrees West. The coordinate system is the set of latitude and longitude lines on the Earth, and the particular location is understood. The basis set is a pair of vectors, each one degree (60 nautical miles) long, with one vector pointed to the North and one vector pointed to the West. - Now in the S-P basis set, shown in
FIG. 2 as orthogonal, the fields can be written as E1=(a′, b′)exp(iωτ) and E2=(c′, d′) so E1·E2=0, but E1+E2=(a′ exp (iωτ)+c′, b′ exp (i ωτ)+d′). Polarization diversity detection detects the s and p components (or projections onto the s and p axes) of E1+E2 separately using two S and P detectors. The power at each detector is proportional to the modulus squared of the components of the total field:
P S ∝|a′ exp(iωτ)+c′| 2 (1)
P P ∝|b′ exp(iωτ)+d′| 2 (2)
These diversity power signals exhibit fringes even though the total field, i.e., the sum of two orthogonal fields, does not. - Polarization diversity detection may be implemented using a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) as show in
FIG. 3 . If the field at the PBS is EbS and is given by Ebs=(A, B) in the basis set of the polarizing beam splitter, then the measured powers at the S and P detectors are PS∝|A|2 and Pp∝|B|2. When the PBS splits the field into different components, the crystalline structure of the PBS imposes an orthonormal basis onto which the incident field is projected. That orthonormal basis is needed to extract information contained in the E1 and E2 amplitudes. - But there are drawbacks with using polarizing beam splitters. First, they are bulky and expensive. Second, polarizing beam splitters add stray reflections to the detected signals. Third, if the polarizing beam splitter is designed to operate in a particular wavelength, e.g., 1500 nm, it cannot be easily and inexpensively altered to operate at a non-standard wavelength, such as 800 nm, at least as compared to a standard optical coupler. For these and other reasons, it is an object of the present invention to perform polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter.
- The present invention performs polarization diversity detection without using a polarizing beam splitter. Field vectors from one interferometer arm are used as the basis upon which to project a field vector from the other interferometer arm. Polarization diversity detection is performed using only standard optical couplers, e.g., 50-50 couplers. A polarization beam splitter is not needed.
- A first coupler receives a first optical signal from a device or system under test and generates first and second coupler outputs. A second coupler receives a second optical signal from a reference source and generates third and fourth coupler outputs. A first polarization controller (PC) changes the polarization state of the third coupler output and generates a PC output. A third coupler generates a first combined output from the first coupler output and the PC output. A fourth coupler generates a second combined output from the second coupler output and the fourth coupler output. A first detector detects a first power of the first combined output in a first projection plane, and a second detector detects a second power of the second combined output in a second projection plane. A processor processes interference terms in the first and second powers in the first and second projection planes to determine one or more characteristics of the first optical signal.
- A second polarization controller changes the polarization of the first optical signal before it is received in the first optical coupler. The first and second polarization controllers are adjusted to calibrate the fiber optic measurement device. Different second polarization controller settings result in multiple corresponding vector measurements at the first and second detectors. The processor calculates a vector calibration matrix using these vector measurements. The processor corrects subsequent detected vector measurements using the vector calibration matrix. The corrected vector measurements ensure that the vector representation of the first optical signal are in an ortho-normal basis set.
- The OFDR components can be constructed simply using optical fiber, and if desired, from the same type of standard low-loss fiber. Matching the type of fiber throughout the optical network results in very low losses with essentially zero scattering events in the network. As a result, the OFDR produces very clean time domain measurements (only reflection events from the device under test appear).
- Another advantage of fiber-based OFDR construction is significant cost reduction and increased reliability and flexibility. A polarization controller can be implemented simply as a single loop of fiber that is moved to achieve a certain polarization state at the output. Once the loop is positioned, it need not be moved again. Couplers are constructed by melting two optical fibers together. In order to manufacture couplers for operation at widely different wavelengths, (e.g., 615 nm and 1550 nm), coupler manufacturers need only purchase fiber (an inexpensive commodity) designed for that wavelength and melt two sections together using the same process for all wavelengths. No re-tooling or significant changes to the process are required. As a result, couplers are readily available at all wavelengths at a reasonable price in contrast to polarization beam splitters and other bulk-optic based optical components.
- Other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrated by way of example the principles of the invention. Like reference symbols refer to like elements throughout.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a Mach-Zender interferometer; -
FIG. 2 illustrates orthogonal measurement field vectors E1 and E2 and two basis vectors S and P; -
FIG. 3 illustrates a Mach-Zender interferometer with a polarization beam splitter; -
FIG. 4 illustrates in function block format an optical frequency domain reflectometer (OFDR) for polarization diversity detection without a polarization beam splitter; -
FIG. 5 illustrates a different configuration of the OFDR shown inFIG. 4 ; -
FIG. 6 illustrates in further detail the detectors shown inFIGS. 4 and 5 ; -
FIG. 7 illustrates in further detail the data acquisition block inFIGS. 4 and 5 ; -
FIG. 8 is a vector diagram showing the measurement field vector E1 and reference field vector E2 each being projected and summed on each of the basis axes S and P in accordance with projections implemented by a polarization beam splitter; -
FIG. 9 is a similar vector diagram for the all coupler OFDR implementations found inFIGS. 4 and 5 ; and -
FIG. 10 is a vector projector diagram showing E1 projected onto virtual reference fields E′S and E′P. - The following description, for purposes of explanation not limitation, sets forth specific details, such as particular components, electronic circuitry, techniques, etc. in order to provide an understanding of the present invention. But it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known methods, devices, and techniques, etc. are omitted so as not to obscure the description with unnecessary detail. Individual function blocks are shown in the figures. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that functions may be implemented using discrete components or multi-function hardware. Processing functions may be implemented using a programmed microprocessor or general-purpose computer, using an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), and/or using one or more digital signal processors (DSPs).
- A first, non-limiting, example OFDR embodiment that does not employ a polarizing beam splitter is described in conjunction with
FIG. 4 . AnOFDR 10 includes atunable laser 12 for generating an electric field at a particular frequency (controlled by the frequency sweep signal from processor 32) provided to a standardoptical coupler 14. Any such coupler may be employed, and one non-limiting example is Gould part number 23-40355-33-01201 manufactured by Gould Fiber Optics Division of Gould Electronics of Baltimore, Md.Coupler 14 splits the input field EIN into two electric field signals E1 and E2. E1 is provided throughoptical coupler 36 andconnector 38 to a device or system under test (DUT) 40. A back-scattered signal E1 to be measured as a function of its reflection point along the fiber is provided throughcoupler 36 to afirst coupler 16. - The reference signal E2 is provided to a
second coupler 22. A polarization state of a first output ofcoupler 22 is changed inpolarization controller 24. The output ofpolarization controller 24 is the reference signal E2 in a first reference plane denoted “S” so that this reference signal is referred to as ES. The second output ofcoupler 22 corresponds to the reference signal in another reference plane labeled “P” so that this signal is denoted EP. The first output ofcoupler 16 is EX and equals M13E1 as described below. The second output ofcoupler 16 is EY and equals M14E1. - The
couplers respective detectors detector 20 is a power PS, and the output of P-detector 28 is a power PP. Both powers are provided to adata acquisition unit 30 which provides digital information toprocessor 32. Theprocessor 32 processes the information and generates the desired electric field output signal EOUT which is then provided to adisplay 34 to display one or more parameters of EOUT. Such parameters may include amplitude and phase of the scattered light and the particular location at which the reflection occurs.Processor 32 sweeps thetunable laser 12 through a particular sweep range specified by a starting wavelength and a finishing wavelength, e.g., 1540 nm-1580 nm. -
FIG. 5 illustrates another example embodiment with a slightly different configuration in which the device undertest 40 is coupled directly to the output of thecoupler 14. Both embodiments employ apolarization controller 42 used in calibrating theOFDR 10 as will be later described. - The
detectors FIG. 6 . Any suitable detector may be employed, and one non-limiting example is a ThorLabs PDA 400 optical detector manufactured by ThorLabs of Newton, N.J. Each detector includes aphotodetector 42 and anamplifier 44 coupled to a low-pass filter 46. Thedata acquisition block 30 includes an analog-to-digital conversion block 48 coupled to abuffer 50. The filtered output from the detector is converted into a digital format by the digital-to-analog conversion means 48, and the digital signal is stored in thebuffer 50 before being processed by thedata processor 32. - The vector diagram in
FIG. 8 shows projected fields on the S and P power detector reference planes. The reference fields S and P are assumed orthogonal—a reasonable assumption if a PBS is used. The S component or projection of the measured field E1 is denoted EX on the horizontal axis, and the P component or projection of the measured field E1 is denoted EY along the vertical axis. The reference field E2 is also projected onto the S and P axes. The sum of EX and ES is detected on theS detector 20, and the sum of the projections EP and EY is detected on theP detector 28. - But when the two fields E1 and E2 are detected by the
coupler pair FIG. 9 . So long as the two transforming matrixes M13 and M14 do not vary with time, this is an acceptable transformation. - Rather than the projection of E1 onto the S and P axes,
FIG. 9 shows the projection of EX onto ES and the projection of EY onto EP. Even though the transforming matrices M13 and M14 are unknown, the reference fields ES and EP may still be transformed in a precise way that allows the detected fields as projections of E1 onto some set of vectors. This is illustrated inFIG. 10 in which E1 is projected onto two non-parallel vectors E′S=M−1 13 ES and E′P=M−1 14 ES. As will be demonstrated below, E1 can be recovered from these projections shown inFIG. 10 using a linear mathematical transformation. - The propagation of a field in an optical fiber from one location to another through any linear section of the system (e.g., optical fiber, optical component, etc.) can be represented by a complex 2×2 matrix. This matrix will account for all effects of the linear section including loss, polarization rotation, and polarization-dependent loss. Let the propagation from coupler i to coupler j (i, j=1,2,3,4) be represented by the matrix Mij. We therefore have
E x=M13E 1 andE y=M14E 1. The interference terms measured at the S- and P-detectors
P s ∝E x ·s *+E x *·s =M 13E 1 ·s *+(M 13E 1)*·s , (3)
P p ∝E y ·p *+E * y ·p =M 14E 1 ·p *+(M 14E 1)*·p . (4) - As described, without a polarizing beam splitter, the vectors S and P no longer form an orthonormnal basis. But knowledge of the amplitude and relative angle between the vectors S and P allows the reconstruction of E1 in an orthogonal basis.
- From Eqs. (3) and (4), it is seen that the detector power measurements of Ps and Pp project the vectors M13E1 and M14E1 into the S-P basis. The fact that the basis-vectors S and P are arbitrary allows use of the identity,
x ·(My )=y ·(Mtx ), where x and y are arbitrary vectors, M is an arbitrary matrix, and Mt is the transpose of matrix M, to write the following:
(M 13E 1)·s =E 1·(M 13 ts *)=E 1 ·s ′ (5)
(M 14E 1)·p =E 1·(M 14 tp *)=E 1 ·p ′ (6) - The vectors
s ′ andp ′ act as the basis vectors onto which E1 is projected. Knowledge of the amplitudes of and relative angle betweens ′ andp ′ allows the projection of E1 onto an orthogonal basis set. What is required is a process by which this correcting matrix can be quickly and efficiently found to transform the measurements into an ortho-normal basis set. - Power measurements at the S and P detectors yield information about the vector field
E =E x+E y in the S-P basis set. Those measurements are of the form
P s =|E x|2 +|s|2+2E x s cos φx (7)
P p =|E y|2 +|p|2+2E y p cos φy (8) - Omitting dc components, we can form the vector,
v =(2Exs cos φx,2Eyp cos φy)=(Es, Ep). But again Es and Ep are not orthogonal. To remedy this, a calibration matrix, M, is determined. When it is multiplied by v, the product gives a new vector E that represents the field E1 in a calibrated, orthogonal basis. - The calibration begins by adjusting the polarization controllers PC1 and PC2 (41 and 24). With the
reference laser 12 in the continuous sweep mode, PC1 is adjusted so that the fringes observed on the P-detector 28 are maximized. When this is accomplished, the fringes on the S-detector 20 are minimized by adjusting PC1. When this is accomplished, PC1 is adjusted so the fringe levels on the S- and P-detectors are approximately equal (to within ±10%). - Once the polarization controllers PC1 and PC2 are adjusted, the OFDR can be calibrated by taking measurements of
v =(2Exs cos φx,2Eyp cos φy) for four distinct but random settings of PC1. The following represent these measurements: - With the above definitions, the following matrix can be formed
where [x y] is a matrix with columns formed by the elements of the vectors x and y. Using the following set of definitions:
the vector-calibration matrix is given by
Any measurement vectorv m=(2Emxs cos φmx,2Emyp cos φmy) can be corrected by performing the following multiplication
E ={circumflex over (M)}v m
where, after the above multiplication, E is guaranteed to be in some orthonormal basis. - Although the above-description is directed to the two polarization modes of standard optical fiber, optical fiber can support a variety of different modes. To handle that mode variety, one coupler and one detector would be added for each new mode present in the fiber. “Mode Controllers” corresponding to fiber loops (like the polarization controller loops) would also be used in each reference path. Calibration would be carried out using analogous linear algebra operations. The absence of stray reflections as described above means that the invention is particularly effective at measuring the very low scatter levels that come from the non-homogeneities in the optical fiber core. Optical-fiber, scatter-level measurements can be used to measure losses within an optical network independently of the manner of connection to the network.
- While the invention has been described in connection with practical and preferred embodiments, the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, the invention covers various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (19)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/520,819 US7379168B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2003-07-08 | Polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US39426002P | 2002-07-09 | 2002-07-09 | |
US10/520,819 US7379168B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2003-07-08 | Polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter |
PCT/US2003/021336 WO2004005973A2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2003-07-08 | Polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060164627A1 US20060164627A1 (en) | 2006-07-27 |
US20080007718A9 true US20080007718A9 (en) | 2008-01-10 |
US7379168B2 US7379168B2 (en) | 2008-05-27 |
Family
ID=30115699
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/520,819 Active 2024-05-10 US7379168B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2003-07-08 | Polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7379168B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003256461A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004005973A2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060279741A1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2006-12-14 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Optical characteristic measuring apparatus |
US20140140691A1 (en) * | 2011-06-28 | 2014-05-22 | Luna Innovations Incorporated | Fiber optic network interrogation tool for combined swept-heterodyne optical spectrum analysis and optical frequency-domain reflectometry |
US9632006B2 (en) | 2013-06-10 | 2017-04-25 | General Photonics Corporation | Distributed fiber bend and stress measurement for determining optical fiber reliability by multi-wavelength optical reflectometry |
US9719883B2 (en) * | 2013-06-10 | 2017-08-01 | General Photonics Corporation | Devices and methods for characterization of distributed fiber bend and stress |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7538860B2 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2009-05-26 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | System and method for determination of the reflection wavelength of multiple low-reflectivity bragg gratings in a sensing optical fiber |
US8773650B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2014-07-08 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Optical position and/or shape sensing |
US9025158B2 (en) | 2010-06-01 | 2015-05-05 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Interferometric measurement with crosstalk suppression |
US9009003B1 (en) | 2012-05-03 | 2015-04-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Apparatus and method for elimination of polarization-induced fading in fiber-optic sensor system |
US9429696B2 (en) | 2012-06-25 | 2016-08-30 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing measurement error in optical fiber shape sensors |
US8909040B1 (en) | 2013-02-05 | 2014-12-09 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Method and apparatus of multiplexing and acquiring data from multiple optical fibers using a single data channel of an optical frequency-domain reflectometry (OFDR) system |
WO2016110467A1 (en) | 2015-01-08 | 2016-07-14 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Optical shape sensing system, medical apparatus and method for optical shape sensing |
GB2576920B (en) * | 2018-09-06 | 2022-07-06 | Univ Cranfield | Fluid sensing system and methods |
US11415481B2 (en) | 2020-08-11 | 2022-08-16 | Subcom, Llc | Line monitoring system having heterodyne coherent detection |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4397551A (en) * | 1981-10-29 | 1983-08-09 | Northern Telecom Limited | Method and apparatus for optical fiber fault location |
US5321501A (en) * | 1991-04-29 | 1994-06-14 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for optical imaging with means for controlling the longitudinal range of the sample |
US5789521A (en) * | 1988-02-17 | 1998-08-04 | Maxdem Incorporated | Rigid-rod polymers |
US6008487A (en) * | 1995-02-02 | 1999-12-28 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Optical-fiber inspection device |
US6111676A (en) * | 1998-02-26 | 2000-08-29 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Wavelength specific optical reflection meter/locator in signatured wavelength division multiplexed systems |
US6376830B1 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2002-04-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | System and method for measuring the transfer function of a guided wave device |
US6608717B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2003-08-19 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Optical coherence microscope and methods of use for rapid in vivo three-dimensional visualization of biological function |
US6856400B1 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2005-02-15 | Luna Technologies | Apparatus and method for the complete characterization of optical devices including loss, birefringence and dispersion effects |
-
2003
- 2003-07-08 AU AU2003256461A patent/AU2003256461A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-07-08 US US10/520,819 patent/US7379168B2/en active Active
- 2003-07-08 WO PCT/US2003/021336 patent/WO2004005973A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4397551A (en) * | 1981-10-29 | 1983-08-09 | Northern Telecom Limited | Method and apparatus for optical fiber fault location |
US5789521A (en) * | 1988-02-17 | 1998-08-04 | Maxdem Incorporated | Rigid-rod polymers |
US5321501A (en) * | 1991-04-29 | 1994-06-14 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for optical imaging with means for controlling the longitudinal range of the sample |
US6008487A (en) * | 1995-02-02 | 1999-12-28 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Optical-fiber inspection device |
US6111676A (en) * | 1998-02-26 | 2000-08-29 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Wavelength specific optical reflection meter/locator in signatured wavelength division multiplexed systems |
US6608717B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2003-08-19 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Optical coherence microscope and methods of use for rapid in vivo three-dimensional visualization of biological function |
US6376830B1 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2002-04-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | System and method for measuring the transfer function of a guided wave device |
US6856400B1 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2005-02-15 | Luna Technologies | Apparatus and method for the complete characterization of optical devices including loss, birefringence and dispersion effects |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060279741A1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2006-12-14 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Optical characteristic measuring apparatus |
US7538885B2 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2009-05-26 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Optical characteristic measuring apparatus |
US20140140691A1 (en) * | 2011-06-28 | 2014-05-22 | Luna Innovations Incorporated | Fiber optic network interrogation tool for combined swept-heterodyne optical spectrum analysis and optical frequency-domain reflectometry |
US9178611B2 (en) * | 2011-06-28 | 2015-11-03 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Fiber optic network interrogation tool for combined swept-heterodyne optical spectrum analysis and optical frequency-domain reflectometry |
US9632006B2 (en) | 2013-06-10 | 2017-04-25 | General Photonics Corporation | Distributed fiber bend and stress measurement for determining optical fiber reliability by multi-wavelength optical reflectometry |
US9719883B2 (en) * | 2013-06-10 | 2017-08-01 | General Photonics Corporation | Devices and methods for characterization of distributed fiber bend and stress |
US9829410B2 (en) | 2013-06-10 | 2017-11-28 | General Photonics Corporation | Distributed fiber bend and stress measurement for determining optical fiber reliability by multi-wavelength optical reflectometry |
US10324002B2 (en) | 2013-06-10 | 2019-06-18 | General Photonics Corporation | Devices and methods for characterization of distributed fiber bend and stress |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2003256461A1 (en) | 2004-01-23 |
US20060164627A1 (en) | 2006-07-27 |
US7379168B2 (en) | 2008-05-27 |
WO2004005973A3 (en) | 2004-03-18 |
WO2004005973A2 (en) | 2004-01-15 |
AU2003256461A8 (en) | 2004-01-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7280221B2 (en) | High efficiency low coherence interferometry | |
US6606158B2 (en) | Determination of a property of an optical device | |
JP3213104B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for determining polarization mode dispersion of optical device | |
US6204924B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring polarization mode dispersion of optical devices | |
US7379168B2 (en) | Polarization diversity detection without a polarizing beam splitter | |
Froggatt et al. | Characterization of polarization-maintaining fiber using high-sensitivity optical-frequency-domain reflectometry | |
CN101871788B (en) | Distributed polarization crosstalk method and device for measuring polarization-preserving fiber and birefringent medium | |
US9041935B2 (en) | Measuring polarization crosstalk in optical birefringent materials and devices based on reduction of line broadening caused by birefringent dispersion | |
JP3290453B2 (en) | Polarization independent type optical coherence area reflection measuring device | |
JP2005221500A (en) | Heterodyne optical network analysis using signal modulation | |
CN107515017A (en) | A kind of optical frequency domain reflectometer of light wave frequency shift modulation | |
Yang et al. | Full evaluation of polarization characteristics of multifunctional integrated optic chip with high accuracy | |
CN108287056B (en) | System and method for evaluating coupling characteristics of optical fiber sensitive ring polarization mode | |
CN104913838A (en) | Anti-polarization mixing single-path circular polarization interference and single wollaston prism splitting-type homodyne laser vibrometer | |
US5654793A (en) | Method and apparatus for high resolution measurement of very low levels of polarization mode dispersion (PMD) in single mode optical fibers and for calibration of PMD measuring instruments | |
US20200196874A1 (en) | Ultrasound Detection by Optical Passive-Demodulation Interferometry using Photonic Integrated Circuits (PIC) | |
JPH03180704A (en) | Laser interference gauge | |
JP3388227B2 (en) | Optical dispersion measuring apparatus and measuring method using the same | |
US10363101B2 (en) | Optical shape sensing system, medical apparatus and method for optical shape sensing | |
Gramatikov | A method of calculating compensators in polarization-sensitive optical systems | |
JPS63241440A (en) | Method and device for measuring frequency response of optical detector | |
Bing et al. | Performance tests of PM optical fiber coupler based on optical coherence domain polarimetry | |
Choi et al. | Accurate evaluation of polarization characteristics in the integrated optic chip for interferometric fiber optic gyroscope based on path-matched interferometry | |
JP3998460B2 (en) | Method for determining characteristics of optical device and inspection device | |
Takada | Analysis of polarization dependence of optical low coherence reflectometry using an active faraday rotator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LUNA TECHNOLOGIES, VIRGINIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FROGGATT, MARK E.;SOLLER, BRIAN J.;WOLFE, MATTHEW S.;REEL/FRAME:016953/0431 Effective date: 20050531 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED, VIRGINIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LUNA TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:018731/0566 Effective date: 20061220 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HANSEN MEDICAL, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:023792/0388 Effective date: 20100112 Owner name: HANSEN MEDICAL, INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:023792/0388 Effective date: 20100112 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK,MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:023985/0718 Effective date: 20100218 Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:023985/0718 Effective date: 20100218 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N V, NETHERLANDS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ECL7, LLC;REEL/FRAME:026468/0920 Effective date: 20110203 Owner name: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V., NETHERLAND Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ECL7, LLC;REEL/FRAME:026468/0920 Effective date: 20110203 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED, VIRGINIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:HANSEN MEDICAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:031784/0755 Effective date: 20110518 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:032355/0264 Effective date: 20140117 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LUNA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME;ASSIGNOR:LUNA TECHNOLOGIES;REEL/FRAME:057710/0785 Effective date: 19990929 |