CA2234621A1 - Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights (dwfq) - Google Patents

Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights (dwfq) Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2234621A1
CA2234621A1 CA002234621A CA2234621A CA2234621A1 CA 2234621 A1 CA2234621 A1 CA 2234621A1 CA 002234621 A CA002234621 A CA 002234621A CA 2234621 A CA2234621 A CA 2234621A CA 2234621 A1 CA2234621 A1 CA 2234621A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
queue
service
weights
fair queue
real
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA002234621A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Natalie Giroux
Raymond Rui-Feng Liao
Mustapha Aissaoui
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nokia Canada Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2234621A1 publication Critical patent/CA2234621A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L12/5602Bandwidth control in ATM Networks, e.g. leaky bucket
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q11/00Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
    • H04Q11/04Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems for time-division multiplexing
    • H04Q11/0428Integrated services digital network, i.e. systems for transmission of different types of digitised signals, e.g. speech, data, telecentral, television signals
    • H04Q11/0478Provisions for broadband connections
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L2012/5678Traffic aspects, e.g. arbitration, load balancing, smoothing, buffer management
    • H04L2012/5679Arbitration or scheduling
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L2012/5678Traffic aspects, e.g. arbitration, load balancing, smoothing, buffer management
    • H04L2012/5681Buffer or queue management

Abstract

In a method of fair queue servicing at a queuing point in a multi-service class packet switched network, incoming packets are received in buffers and outgoing packets are scheduled by a weighted fair queue scheduler. Real-time information of buffer usage along with the minimum bandwidth requirement is used to dynamically modify the weights of the weighted fair queue scheduler.

Description

CA 0223462l l998-04-l4 Fair ~ueue Servicing using dynamic weights (DWFQ) This invention relates to the field of telecornmunications, and more particularly to a method of fair queue servicing in asynchronous data networks, such as Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) networks or more generally any packet switched network that supports more than one class of service.
The use of ATM by a continually increasing number of applications is driving a requirement to increase the number of service classes and to allow more flexibility in the service offerings To support the application requirements, the ATM Forum is adding new service categories in new releases of ATM specifications. Furtherrnore, network providers are looking for the flexibility of defining multiple service classes for a given service categorv. The service classes are differentiated by their Quality-Of-Service requirements (QoS). The QoS requirements are configurable in accordance ~,vith a bi-dimensional matrix describing loss and delay. The delay jitter is another factor which needs to be bounded for some service classes.
Previously~ three service categories were supported on an ATM network element, namely constant bit rate (CBR), variable bit rate (VBR) and unspecified bit rate (UBR) The CBR service is the only service that guarantees a bound on delay. It is used for time sensitive data~ such as voice and video.
These v arious services can be supported by traditional exhaustive round-robin queuing among two priority queues. However, this simple technique cannot be usedwhen the number of queues increases beyond two, because of the high potential ofstarvation for lo~-er priority queues. Furthermore, the exhaustive round robin can only guarantee bounds on delay and delay variation for the highest priority queue. The support of multiple service class in an ATM switching product or multiplexer requires a minimum of one queue per class.
A queue scheduling algorithm. Weighted Fair Queuing (WFQ), has been recently proposed in the literature (see S. Golestani, ~ self-clocked Fair Queuing scheme for broadband applications INFOCOM 1994. ~une 1994) 06~as/ss as:s3 F~g CA 02234621 1998-04-14 ~08 .. ~ 2 ~
l~is s~ n~ scheme allows any nLunber queues (ser~ice classes) to be 1.
senriced, while providmg f~ir a~d work conser~ng access to b~ndwidth One of the key features of WFQ is thdt the CDV (Cell Delay Variation) ~s boul.d~l for any sen~ice class, as long as it is giv~n a ...1..,.."-.., weight~
~ Thisplo~os~ scheme can be imple.. ,L d in ATM products. Howe~er, it has not been ~ f-~rrnin~d how to set the servicin~ wei~hts ~-ffi-jfntly to take into account the dyn~ ic~llly ~hs~nein~ bandwidth ~.~ c.-~ of each service class (COnn~t'Or addition/removal, ABR flow control, Early packet Discard).
An object of the inverLtion is to p~ovide a Lan.e~voll; that ensures that the wei~hts are set d~ u~;ately to ~ e the desired Quality of Ser~rice and modified in real-time to ensure that the dynarnic Allnc~ n of bandwidth across the classes is opLi~
ALcor~ g to the present invention there is provided a me~od of fair queue servicing at a queu ng point in a multi~service class packet :,wiL~ihed network, where~n in~ min~ packets are received in buffers and outgoing packets are scheduled by aweightedfairqueues~ d~-lPrclL~dL.~;~e~inthatrePl-time;llf.ill,.Aii-nofbufferusage alongwiththeln.. ~;.~.. ~,baIldwidth~ tisusedtody.,~.nieAllymodifythe weighi:s of the weighted f~ur queue 5f~h~ r so as to cause buf~er queue si e to move toward a ~r~f ~ .i.,~l target value.
Preferablythe...illi.~ ll.bandw~dthr~ .Lis~ tP-l duri~gco~,Lon ~r1rniccir~n control Ihe medlod is pal1icularly suitable for use in ATM r~tworks.
The DWF Q (D~c Weighted Fair Queuing) can be impl.omPn~rrl at any queuing point which cl~lJiLLa~3 senr~c~g between n queues (n>2).
The invention also provides a fair queue servic~ng ~ ">~ ~1 in a multi-serv~ce class packet switched rletwork, comr~c;n~ a weighted f~ir queuing controller, and buffer means for rece~vLllg ;nco~ n~ packets in queues, ~ LP. ;7e~1 m that fi~her c~ .. ,l., ;~P~ I
means for mor~itoril~g buffer usage for each queue, means for det. ~ninin~ the bandwidth reqUir~ of each class of ser~r~ce, and a service weights nn~ns~e~r for dyn~min~lly modifying ~e weights of said weîghted fair queuing con~oller means in response to said bufferusage and bandw~dth~i~4.ne.~

A~k~l~ED StlEET

CA 0223462l l998-04-l4 Preferably, the means for monitoring buffer usage a queue growth monitor which perforrns real-time ~?s1im~tion of the queue growth in said buffer means.
The invention will now be described in more detail~ by way of example only. withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-Figure 1 is a diagram depicting the high level queuing scheme at an ATM switch;
Figure ~ shows the inforrnation provided by the Queue Growth Monitor, Figure 3 illustrates the data flow between the key components of the system andthe action of the Service Weight Manager (SWM); and Figure 4 describes the process performed by the SWM.
Referring now to Figure 1, ATM cells 2 arrive at buffer 1 and are placed in queues 11,12,...1n From there the cells are passed to a weighted fair queuing unit 3. The buffer I
is also connected to a queue growth monitor 4, which in turn is connected to congestion control unit 5, congestion analyzer 6, and connection admission controller 8, which in turn is connected to SVC & PVC (Switched Virtual Circuit and Permanent Virtual Circuit) connection handling unit 7, and service class manager 10. Queue growth monitor 4, connection admission controller 8 and service class manager 9 are connected to service weights manager 9, which is connected to weighted fair queuing scheduler 3 The key element of the Dynamic Weighted Fair Queuing (DWFQ) scheme is the service weight manager (SWM) 9, which dynamically modifies the service weights to be used by the WFQ Scheduler 3 It uses real-time information from the service classmanager 10, the connection admission controller 8, and the Queue growth monitor 4.
The service class manager 10 configures the service classes. A service class is configured with a given value of delay (CTD - Cell Transfer Delay) and loss (CLR - Cell Ratio Loss) requirements. These parameters represent the maximum nodal delay and loss allowed in order to meet the end-to-end QoS requirements of the connection. The service classes are mapped into a priority table as exemplified in Table 1. The priority table is used later by the service weight manager to allocate rem~ining bandwidth. The priority table is updated when a service class definition is modified. The service class manager also dictates which traff1c descriptors are used to compute the miniml-m bandwidth required by a connection of a given class.
CTD
CLR 100 ~s 500 lls None 10-~ 4 7 9 Table I ~ Example of a Queue Service Priority Mapping.
The connection admission controller (CAC) 8 computes the miniml-m bandwidth required for each service class. The minimum bandwidth is updated each time a connection of a given class is established or discormected, based on its traffic descriptor.
Table 2 shows a typical example of which traffic descriptors that can be used tocompute the minimum bandwidth for each basic service category relative to the queue service rate (SR) The CAC 8 communicates the minimum Weight table to the SWM
every time the value of the minimum weights have changed by a factor of ~,.
Queue; Category min Wi Ql CBR (~ PCR) / SR
Q2 RT-VBR (~ SCR) / SR
Q3 NRT- (~ SCR) / SR
VBR

Table 2 ~ Example of minimum weight table The CTD is further taken into account in the target queue size (TQS) table, which is the maximum queue size allowed to limit the CTD An example of TQSi computation is shown in Table 3, for typical service categories A zero TQS indicates that the queue can grow without limitation This table is computed by the CAC.

Queuei Category TQSi Q I CBR CTD / min Wi Q2 RT-VBR CTD / min Wi VBR

Table 2 ~ Example of a target queue size computation.
The Queue Growth Monitor (QGM) 4 performs real-time çstim~tion of the queue growth every Ts cell slots (sampling interval~. The information provided by the Queue Growth monitor 4 to the SWM 9 consists of ~Qi, the Queue Growth Rate of output queue i during an interval of duration Ts, Qi, the length of output queue i at the sampling time, and Ai, the arrival rate during the same interval of time.
The corresponding parameters: queue size Qi, queue growth ~Qi, number of arrivals Ai are collected or each queue by the QGM 4 for each Ts interval. From these parameters, auxiliary parameters such as average arrival rate ~i and service rate ~Li can be -derived by the SWM 9:
: average arrival rate, ?~j = Aj Ts llj: average service rate, llj = Sj - Ts~ where Sj = Aj--~Qj is the number of cells served during Ts.
Figure 2 shows the information provided by the Queue Growth Monitor 4. Using this inforrnation for the CAC 8, the service class manager 9 and the queue growth monitor 4, the SWM computes the service eight for each queue i (Wj) to be used during the next sampling interval.
As can be seen in Figure 3~ which shows the data flow between the key components of the system and the action of the SWM 9, the queue weights. Wi, areupdated usin~ information provided by the Queue Growth monitor 4.
If ~ j denotes the arrival rate of cells in queue i in the coming Ts interval, then ideally, the target service rate l~ j can be calculated as: (~ } Ts = Qi--TQSj . This means at the end of ne~t Ts interval, the queue size Qi will reach the target queue size TQSi. On the assurnption that ~j remains 1~nr.h:~n~ed from ~j, the service weight W, = ~ T5 can be approxim:~tecl as W~ Ts--~j ~ T5 + Qi--TQSj = Aj + Qj--TQSi .
However, the assurnption on the stable arrival rate may not hold, and also the actual number of serviced cells Si could be less than Wi; therefore a more conservative approach is ~Qj > 0, then Qj+~Qj, the predicted queue size at the end of the next Ts interval, is used to calculate the target service rate and weight. That is:
Ts = Q~ + ~Q,--TQSj and Wj--~j ~Ts +Qj +~Qj--TQSi = Aj +Qj + /~Qj--TQSi The detailed algorithm performed by the service weights manager 9 is shown in Figure 4. The queue size Qj at the end of each interval Ts~ the nurnber of arrivals Aj during the previous inten,~al Ts~ and the change in queue size ~Qi are input at step 20. Step 21 ~etermines whether the queue growth is positive: if yes, the sel~ice weight Wj is conservatively adjusted to bring the queue size to TQSi at step 22; if no, the service weight Wj is adjusted to bring the queue si~e to TQSi at step 23. The difference i~W is deterrnined in step 24.
Step ~5 determines whether the shared weights pool is empty: if yes, Wi is set to min_Wi in step 26; if no, step 27 determines whether Ws 2 ~Wi: if yes, step 28 sets Wj =
min_Wj + AWi and Ws = Ws ~ ~Wj; if no, step 29 sets Wj= min_Wi ~ Ws and Ws = 0.
Step 30 runs through all the Wj in the ordered list L and step 31 updates the ~eight table used by the Weighted Fair Queuing scheduler 3.
The described technique complies with ITU and ATM Forum standards and can be applied to any switching equipment which supports more than a single service class of servlce.

Claims (5)

Claims:
1. A method of fair queue servicing at a queuing point in a multi-service class packet switched network, wherein incoming packets are received in buffers and outgoing packets are scheduled by a weighted fair queue scheduler characterized in that real-timeinformation of buffer usage along with the minimum bandwidth requirement is used to dynamically modify the weights of the weighted fair queue scheduler so as to cause buffer queue size to move toward a predetermined target value.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, the minimum bandwidth requirement is extracted during connection admission control.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that said weights are also modified in accordance with real-time service class information.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that buffer usage is monitored by a queue growth monitor, which performs real-time estimation of the queue growth every sampling interval T5.
5. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 4, wherein said packet switched network is an ATM network and said packets are ATM cells.
CA002234621A 1995-10-11 1996-10-11 Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights (dwfq) Abandoned CA2234621A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9520807.0 1995-10-11
GBGB9520807.0A GB9520807D0 (en) 1995-10-11 1995-10-11 Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2234621A1 true CA2234621A1 (en) 1997-04-17

Family

ID=10782138

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002234621A Abandoned CA2234621A1 (en) 1995-10-11 1996-10-11 Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights (dwfq)

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US6317416B1 (en)
EP (1) EP0872088B1 (en)
AU (1) AU7123596A (en)
CA (1) CA2234621A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69618010T2 (en)
GB (1) GB9520807D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1997014240A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (87)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6850540B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2005-02-01 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Packet scheduling in a communications system
GB9520807D0 (en) * 1995-10-11 1995-12-13 Newbridge Networks Corp Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights
US6452933B1 (en) 1997-02-07 2002-09-17 Lucent Technologies Inc. Fair queuing system with adaptive bandwidth redistribution
FI970998A (en) * 1997-03-10 1998-11-13 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Procedure for determining whether to allow a connection on a broadband network
JP2968757B2 (en) 1997-05-16 1999-11-02 日本電気株式会社 ATM traffic rate control method
CA2223118A1 (en) * 1997-11-28 1999-05-28 Newbridge Networks Corporation Virtual path level fairness
US6389019B1 (en) * 1998-03-18 2002-05-14 Nec Usa, Inc. Time-based scheduler architecture and method for ATM networks
US7466703B1 (en) * 1998-05-01 2008-12-16 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Scalable high speed router apparatus
EP1013036B1 (en) * 1998-06-16 2010-02-17 Alcatel Lucent Digital traffic switch with credit-based buffer control
US6714517B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2004-03-30 Extreme Networks Method and apparatus for interconnection of packet switches with guaranteed bandwidth
GB9828142D0 (en) * 1998-12-22 1999-02-17 Power X Limited Approximate state control mechanism
US6498781B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2002-12-24 International Business Machines Corporation Self-tuning link aggregation system
US7054267B2 (en) * 1999-09-10 2006-05-30 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for scheduling traffic to meet quality of service requirements in a communication network
US7072295B1 (en) 1999-09-15 2006-07-04 Tellabs Operations, Inc. Allocating network bandwidth
WO2001020876A1 (en) * 1999-09-15 2001-03-22 Tellabs Operations, Inc. Allocating network bandwidth
US6480911B1 (en) * 1999-09-23 2002-11-12 At&T Corp. Grouping class sensitive queues
US6614440B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2003-09-02 Microsoft Corporation System and method for load balancing in a multi-channel graphics system
US6438135B1 (en) * 1999-10-21 2002-08-20 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Dynamic weighted round robin queuing
JP2001156785A (en) * 1999-11-26 2001-06-08 Nec Corp Cell abort avoidance system and method in buffer
JP2001177575A (en) * 1999-12-20 2001-06-29 Nec Corp Preferential control system
US6434155B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2002-08-13 Alcatel Usa Sourcing, L.P. Weighted round robin engine used in scheduling the distribution of ATM cells
US6999420B1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2006-02-14 At & T Corp. Method and apparatus for an architecture and design of internet protocol quality of service provisioning
US6775292B1 (en) * 2000-01-24 2004-08-10 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method for servicing of multiple queues carrying voice over virtual circuits based on history
KR100369562B1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2003-01-30 학교법인 한국정보통신학원 Emulated weighted fair queueing algorithm for high-speed integrated service networks and the scheduler therefor
GB0007394D0 (en) 2000-03-27 2000-05-17 Nokia Networks Oy Transmitting packet data
TW488135B (en) * 2000-03-31 2002-05-21 Ibm Method and system for controlling flows in sub-pipes of computer networks
US7215678B1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2007-05-08 Switchcore, A.B. Method and apparatus for distribution of bandwidth in a switch
US6795870B1 (en) 2000-04-13 2004-09-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for network processor scheduler
US6952424B1 (en) 2000-04-13 2005-10-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for network processor scheduling outputs using queueing
US6862292B1 (en) 2000-04-13 2005-03-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for network processor scheduling outputs based on multiple calendars
US7315901B1 (en) 2000-04-13 2008-01-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for network processor scheduling outputs using disconnect/reconnect flow queues
US7142558B1 (en) 2000-04-17 2006-11-28 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dynamic queuing control for variable throughput communication channels
EP1284071B1 (en) 2000-05-18 2007-07-11 Xyratex Technology Limited Apparatus and method for resource arbitration
US7061861B1 (en) * 2000-07-06 2006-06-13 Broadband Royalty Corporation Method and system for weighted fair flow control in an asynchronous metro packet transport ring network
US6909722B1 (en) * 2000-07-07 2005-06-21 Qualcomm, Incorporated Method and apparatus for proportionately multiplexing data streams onto one data stream
US6990113B1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2006-01-24 Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs., Inc. Adaptive-weighted packet scheduler for supporting premium service in a communications network
US6766376B2 (en) 2000-09-12 2004-07-20 Sn Acquisition, L.L.C Streaming media buffering system
US6975638B1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2005-12-13 Force10 Networks, Inc. Interleaved weighted fair queuing mechanism and system
JP2004514324A (en) * 2000-11-08 2004-05-13 モトローラ・インコーポレイテッド Service weight class adaptation method
US20040062261A1 (en) * 2001-02-07 2004-04-01 Rami Zecharia Multi-service segmentation and reassembly device having integrated scheduler and advanced multi-timing wheel shaper
US6990115B2 (en) * 2001-02-26 2006-01-24 Seabridge Ltd. Queue control method and system
US7486686B2 (en) * 2001-02-26 2009-02-03 Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation Method and apparatus for scheduling data on a medium
US7016364B2 (en) * 2001-05-04 2006-03-21 Alcatel Canada Inc. Power pooling in network downstream data transmission
GB2381406A (en) * 2001-10-24 2003-04-30 Ipwireless Inc Packet data queuing and processing
CA2440236C (en) * 2001-12-28 2008-02-12 Nokia Corporation Packet scheduling method and apparatus
JP3828431B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2006-10-04 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Base station, control apparatus, communication system, and communication method
US7362749B2 (en) * 2002-03-01 2008-04-22 Verizon Business Global Llc Queuing closed loop congestion mechanism
GB0207507D0 (en) * 2002-03-28 2002-05-08 Marconi Corp Plc An apparatus for providing communications network resource
FI20020673A0 (en) * 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Nokia Corp Timing real-time packet data
JP3872716B2 (en) * 2002-04-30 2007-01-24 富士通株式会社 Packet output control device
US7142513B2 (en) * 2002-05-23 2006-11-28 Yea-Li Sun Method and multi-queue packet scheduling system for managing network packet traffic with minimum performance guarantees and maximum service rate control
JP2004086177A (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-03-18 Brother Ind Ltd Method of manufacturing polymer resin particles for toner
US7301943B2 (en) * 2002-07-31 2007-11-27 Industrial Technology Research Institute QoS-oriented burstification method supporting various grades of burstification delay guarantee
US7263065B1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2007-08-28 At&T Corp. Network having multiple QoS levels
FI112421B (en) 2002-10-29 2003-11-28 Tellabs Oy Method and device for time allocation of transmission connection capacity between packet switched data communication flows
US20040100903A1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-05-27 Seung-Jae Han Quality of service mechanisms for mobility access device
US7782885B1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2010-08-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for queue management using queue sets
US7272658B1 (en) 2003-02-13 2007-09-18 Adobe Systems Incorporated Real-time priority-based media communication
US7257083B2 (en) * 2003-06-25 2007-08-14 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for policy-based dynamic preemptive scheduling of data transmissions
US7373420B1 (en) * 2003-08-01 2008-05-13 Nortel Networks Limited Method and apparatus for weighted fair queuing
US7376083B2 (en) * 2003-12-09 2008-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for modeling queueing systems with highly variable traffic arrival rates
US7403488B2 (en) * 2004-02-17 2008-07-22 Mitsubishi Electric Research Labortories, Inc. Scheduling packet flows in multi-rate wireless local area networks
US7712102B2 (en) * 2004-07-30 2010-05-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for dynamically configuring a plurality of load balancers in response to the analyzed performance data
US7545815B2 (en) * 2004-10-18 2009-06-09 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Queueing technique for multiple sources and multiple priorities
US7352752B2 (en) * 2004-11-29 2008-04-01 Agere Systems Inc. Frame mapping scheduler with compressed mapping table
US20060187934A1 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-24 Jordan Lu Method and apparatus for monitoring and improving performance of a queuing scheduler
WO2006109131A2 (en) * 2005-04-11 2006-10-19 Nokia Corporation, Method and apparatus to facilitate real-time packet scheduling in a wireless communications system
US20070165647A1 (en) * 2006-01-19 2007-07-19 Tellabs Operations, Inc. Apparatus, method, and computer program for data packet scheduling
US20080091866A1 (en) * 2006-10-12 2008-04-17 International Business Machines Corporation Maintaining forward progress in a shared L2 by detecting and breaking up requestor starvation
US8681807B1 (en) 2007-05-09 2014-03-25 Marvell Israel (M.I.S.L) Ltd. Method and apparatus for switch port memory allocation
US7961878B2 (en) 2007-10-15 2011-06-14 Adobe Systems Incorporated Imparting cryptographic information in network communications
US8134924B2 (en) * 2007-11-27 2012-03-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus related to scheduling in a wireless communications system using shared air link resources for traffic
US8045563B2 (en) 2007-12-27 2011-10-25 Cellco Partnership Dynamically adjusted credit based round robin scheduler
US8208406B1 (en) * 2008-03-25 2012-06-26 Juniper Networks, Inc. Packet forwarding using feedback controlled weighted queues dynamically adjusted based on processor utilization
US8325687B2 (en) * 2008-05-09 2012-12-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Techniques for enhanced backhaul flow control
US8051287B2 (en) 2008-10-15 2011-11-01 Adobe Systems Incorporated Imparting real-time priority-based network communications in an encrypted communication session
JP5304670B2 (en) * 2010-01-25 2013-10-02 富士通株式会社 Portable communication terminal device, short-range wireless communication control method, and short-range wireless communication control program
EP2510780A1 (en) * 2011-03-25 2012-10-17 Syngenta Participations AG. Novel squash plant for protected culture
CN105075202B (en) 2013-03-28 2019-07-12 英国电讯有限公司 For handling method, node and the packet network of grouping in packet network
GB201313760D0 (en) * 2013-07-31 2013-09-18 British Telecomm Fast friendly start for a data flow
KR101877595B1 (en) * 2013-10-28 2018-07-12 주식회사 케이티 METHOD FOR CONTROLLING QoS USING TRAFFIC PROCESSING BASED ON SERVICE
CN106030031B (en) 2013-12-06 2019-11-19 哈里伯顿能源服务公司 Control shaft bottom sub-assembly follows the computer implemented method and system in planning pit shaft path
CN107852372B (en) 2015-08-06 2021-05-11 英国电讯有限公司 Data packet network
WO2017021046A1 (en) 2015-08-06 2017-02-09 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Data packet network
US10182017B2 (en) 2016-06-30 2019-01-15 Mellanox Technologies Tlv Ltd. Estimating multiple distinct-flow counts in parallel
US10218642B2 (en) 2017-03-27 2019-02-26 Mellanox Technologies Tlv Ltd. Switch arbitration based on distinct-flow counts
US11558775B2 (en) 2021-02-16 2023-01-17 Juniper Networks, Inc. Determining rate differential weighted fair output queue scheduling for a network device

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5179557A (en) * 1989-07-04 1993-01-12 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Data packet communication system in which data packet transmittal is prioritized with queues having respective assigned priorities and frequency weighted counting of queue wait time
US5231633A (en) * 1990-07-11 1993-07-27 Codex Corporation Method for prioritizing, selectively discarding, and multiplexing differing traffic type fast packets
US5335224A (en) * 1992-06-30 1994-08-02 At&T Bell Laboratories Service guarantees/congestion control in high speed networks
NL9201668A (en) * 1992-09-25 1994-04-18 Nederland Ptt Method for converting a polling frequency table into a polling sequence table.
CA2104753C (en) * 1992-10-29 1999-02-16 Kotikalapudi Sriram Bandwidth allocation, transmission scheduling, and congestion avoidance in broadband atm networks
US5432790A (en) * 1993-09-17 1995-07-11 Motorola, Inc. Method for allocating internodal link bandwidth in a packet oriented communication network to guarantee delay quality-of-service
US5517495A (en) * 1994-12-06 1996-05-14 At&T Corp. Fair prioritized scheduling in an input-buffered switch
JP3434642B2 (en) * 1995-07-07 2003-08-11 株式会社東芝 Packet scheduling device
GB9520807D0 (en) * 1995-10-11 1995-12-13 Newbridge Networks Corp Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights
DE19548985A1 (en) * 1995-12-28 1997-07-03 Siemens Ag Method for prioritizing cell streams in systems that transmit information according to an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM)
US6377583B1 (en) * 1996-06-27 2002-04-23 Xerox Corporation Rate shaping in per-flow output queued routing mechanisms for unspecified bit rate service
US6452933B1 (en) * 1997-02-07 2002-09-17 Lucent Technologies Inc. Fair queuing system with adaptive bandwidth redistribution
US6014367A (en) * 1997-04-25 2000-01-11 Mmc Networks, Inc Method for weighted fair queuing for ATM cell scheduling
US6721325B1 (en) * 1998-04-23 2004-04-13 Alcatel Canada Inc. Fair share scheduling of multiple service classes with prioritized shaping
US6501762B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2002-12-31 Nortel Networks Limited Scheduler implementing weighted fair queuing by a weight limited first in-first out methodology
KR100343935B1 (en) * 2000-10-09 2002-07-20 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 Dbwrr cell scheduling device and method thereof in imt-2000 atm switch
US7155716B2 (en) * 2002-03-08 2006-12-26 Intel Corporation Weighted and prioritized task scheduler
US20040151197A1 (en) * 2002-10-21 2004-08-05 Hui Ronald Chi-Chun Priority queue architecture for supporting per flow queuing and multiple ports
US20050047415A1 (en) * 2003-08-28 2005-03-03 Radhakrishna Channegowda Data traffic manager and method therefor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69618010T2 (en) 2002-08-22
US6317416B1 (en) 2001-11-13
WO1997014240A1 (en) 1997-04-17
US20020044529A1 (en) 2002-04-18
AU7123596A (en) 1997-04-30
GB9520807D0 (en) 1995-12-13
EP0872088B1 (en) 2001-12-12
US7023866B2 (en) 2006-04-04
EP0872088A1 (en) 1998-10-21
DE69618010D1 (en) 2002-01-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2234621A1 (en) Fair queue servicing using dynamic weights (dwfq)
US5862126A (en) Connection admission control for ATM networks
EP0901301B1 (en) Dynamic rate control scheduler for ATM networks
US5917804A (en) Connection admission control for ATM networks handling CBR and VBR services
US5999534A (en) Method and apparatus for scheduling cells for use in a static priority scheduler
US6324165B1 (en) Large capacity, multiclass core ATM switch architecture
US5850399A (en) Hierarchical packet scheduling method and apparatus
Duffield et al. On adaptive bandwidth sharing with rate guarantees
Chao et al. A new QoS-guaranteed cell discarding strategy: self-calibrating pushout
Ahmed et al. Systems approach to modeling the token bucket algorithm in computer networks
Vickers et al. Congestion control and resource management in diverse ATM environments
EP2063580A1 (en) Low complexity scheduler with generalized processor sharing GPS like scheduling performance
Chiussi et al. Providing QoS guarantees in packet switches
Saran et al. A scheduling discipline and admission control policy for Xunet 2
Duan et al. Resource allocation for quality of service provision in buffered crossbar switches
Peha Scheduling and admission control for integrated-services networks: The priority token bank
KR100221324B1 (en) Apparatus and method of dynamic priority queueing discipline using the per-session frame defined by the synchronus counter operation in atm networks
Katevenis et al. Multi-queue management and scheduling for improved QoS in communication networks
Jain A survey of scheduling methods
Hou et al. Service disciplines for guaranteed performance service
Chiou et al. DMGFQ: a novel traffic scheduler with differentiated QoS guarantee for Internet multimedia services
KR100191257B1 (en) Apparatus for real-time queue service discipline using virtual clock algorithm in atm networks
Chen et al. Traffic control approaches for voice over ATM networks
Burakowski et al. BETTER: handling best effort traffic in the ATM networks
Fan et al. Real-time video applications over ABR using FASTRAC-a rate control algorithm

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
FZDE Discontinued